austhrow743

I use the api because i don’t use chatgpt enough to justify the cost of their UI offering.

At least for me it’s more like “this guys career is still way better than mine so it’s hard to think of his situation as suffering”.

>while the old guard starts to use it as a notification board

It sounded to me like that’s been the intention since it was started. The in person meetings are the point and the whatsapp group exists to facilitate that.

Has something changed recently that all of your theoretical concerns are now in play when they weren't for the last 14 years?

Darknet marketplaces.

It's responsible for facilitating a ton of fantastic trips amongst myself and friends.

We had extra money. There were some people on the Netherlands with some extra lsd. We swapped using Bitcoin. Value was created.

Trade is a positive sum gain and Bitcoin makes it easier.

Because SpaceX can build them cheaper.

Redacted is the spiritual successor to What. Not sure how much of What's collection made it over but Redacted's is larger.

What when it closed:

Torrents: 2,588,359

Releases: 1,066,026

Artists: 884,432

"Perfect" FLACs: 863,944

Redacted now:

Torrents: 3,225,076

Releases: 1,675,757

Artists: 1,253,924

"Perfect" FLACs: 2,023,560

What part are you disagreeing with?

We will work jobs where being human is an innate part of the value proposition eg. servants, wait staff, sex workers.

There are also jobs you wouldn't historically thought of where being human is an innate part of the value proposition but I've seen takes on here from people saying they'll stop watching movies and go to see live plays when movies become purely AI generated.

That someone gives you the right to use their code doesn't mean they're required to be a free hosting provider for you.

What is the contract that gives WP Engine the free house?

This is accurate if by landlord you mean "the person in whose house you have been squatting without paying rent or signing a lease."

"A third party will complain" is not a valid reason to provide poor service to your customers.

America not using its nuclear advantage to secure its nuclear advantage doesn’t mean it couldn’t have.

If they had an informal development in exchange for server access type relationship then that would qualify as some sort of obligation.

Doesn't really have anything to do with open source though. Haven't seen anything about matt/wordpress.org/Automattic trying to prevent them from using open source code.

Seems like you should act as if you will be.

If the one offering 20% over listed price is the one causing the listed price to be far more than 20% below what the company could be worth if they were running it properly, most people would consider that to be a ripoff.

My take on their comment was that it should be worth many billions if it was being run effectively but that it's not.

That doesn't mean the market is wrong, it means the market thinks it will continue to be run ineffectively.

Probably not.

Many wouldn’t consider Twitter to be a blue chip stock.

My understanding of their comment is that the source is made available immediately. It’s just that you need to pay for a license to use it for the first couple years.

As long as it’s an ongoing relationship nothing needs to be said. Apple knows that if more users swap away from the default then the default setting is less valuable.

Sue google with $50?

Did you chuck gravity in there to be hyperbolic or has someone really published a paper where they have data implying they got gravity not to apply to mice?

Ads would be less effective at convincing people to be unhappy.

How does it change the network owners ability to decide who gets to join their network?

Sure. That's also the assumption when you upload your private information to someone else's computer. Except for the "unless explicitly promised otherwise" part.

Some people wont give it and then they will have less data.

You're comparing the success case of donations against the failure case of profit side projects.