Is everyone here more design/graphics oriented?
Between firefox tabs, emacs buffers, and GNU screen, I hardly make use of the window manager at all.
266 karma · joined March 27, 2008
Is everyone here more design/graphics oriented?
Between firefox tabs, emacs buffers, and GNU screen, I hardly make use of the window manager at all.
Humans are able to have significant interaction through more than physical means. It is incredible, I know.
http://theburningbiscuit.com/Pictures%20for%20site/Demotivat...
http://theburningbiscuit.com/Pictures%20for%20site/Demotivat...
http://theburningbiscuit.com/Pictures%20for%20site/Demotivat...
http://theburningbiscuit.com/Pictures%20for%20site/Demotivat...
If not accepted, will pursue ninja assassin career.
http://www.livescience.com/health/070522_finger_sats.html
Although I myself did well on the SAT's, I too am hesitant to support the use of correlations like these in determining what students, or anyone deserves.
With regard to SATs and academic performance, the first google result:
"Findings indicated a very low correlation between SAT math scores and overall college math grades of six graduating classes at one university"
http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetai...
(edited, brevity.)
No causality relationship was proven. Much less I have no idea what was actually established given a total lack of numbers. A 1% drop? A 15% drop? Big difference.
8 is interesting. So instead of just building upon the best aspect of the games, they do a lot to improve the worst. Guess that makes sense though given that games generally have a more restricted flow than apps.
9, Another good datapoint in the ongoing debate over "release early to customers" vs "release high quality." Then again, they do use somewhat of a hybrid as I'm sure they have testers before they do the full scale release. Or do they?
10, There are "new" types of games coming out of the console gaming industry? I'm hardly convinced...
So people give up a little when others tell them that they are bad at what they've worked so hard to do well at, or do a little extra if superiority appears to be within reach. Seems like a whole lot of fluff for such a simple observation.
People are EXTREMELY resistant to becoming advertising tools for corporations.
Techcrunch in particular is a traditional publicity channel that gets most of its information through heavily biased sources such as press releases, friends, etc. instead of directly from the users. This is why I find it hilarious that techcrunch should be the ones to call them out on producing biased information.
Then again, Arrington has been working to discover sites as a user through hn for example, so he may be doing a small part to correct this wrong.
Him: It's impossible. You: It's so certain, it's basically guaranteed!
You can be a person who behaves very aggressively with what appears to be extremely risky behavior but at the same time calculate risk very carefully with as much data as possible. This is what I aim to be, a calculated risk taker. Not a foolish man who dives head first without thinking.
Motivation is really great, but I don't see a lot of value in blind optimism.
I agree that this elimination of competition is bad for the consumers, bad for innovation, and bad for those more capable companies that didn't get the huge funding. It's just making the rich richer.
Or are you talking about the same news but in Spanish?
I don't know many people who learn languages without the intent of ever spending time to do something with them.
Regardless, the analogy is broken because one case is about what you are and the other is about what someone wants to take from you.
Or are you referring to business communications? I'm sure that no one in the US undervalues the effectiveness and persuasiveness of voice communication for critical negotiations.
On second reading, I think you're just referring to the resistance of old people to new technology?