HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

arvarik

133 karma · joined July 8, 2020

submissionscomments
arvarik··on The stable marriage problem and modern dating
This is an interesting point. The way Tinder works is a little different than how this problem is normally modeled since both people need to swipe (propose) in order to get a match and therefore proposals are bidirectional. There is still some subtleties because people don't know who swiped right on them (unless they have gold).

A more apt comparison is how Hinge works. People don't need to actively go out and 'like' people, they can just sit and wait for likes to come in and they can choose if they want to match or not.

I would be very interested to see Hinge data for how often men give out likes versus women.

arvarik··on The stable marriage problem and modern dating
The first graph shows that choosing first does give an advantage, however like another poster has said, the advantage is amplified with how each gender sees each other.
arvarik··on The stable marriage problem and modern dating
So there's two reasons why there is a male preference advantage here: 1) I ran the algorithm assuming the men make the first move and 2) Male/female normal/pareto correlation in attractiveness

Do you mean what would happen if the distributions were switched but men still make the first move? I could change up the script and run it again if that's what you mean!

arvarik··on The stable marriage problem and modern dating
Thanks! :) You can connect with me on LinkedIn which is linked at the top of the site!
arvarik··on The stable marriage problem and modern dating
Right, I should have made that a bit clearer. Modern dating is harder because the pursuit of a stable marriage is harder.

Although this is all assuming people date to get married.