Reframed so maybe you'd better understand the relationship between these concepts. This isn't cutting edge precedent!
239 karma · joined September 20, 2018
Reframed so maybe you'd better understand the relationship between these concepts. This isn't cutting edge precedent!
disagree, and the courts will likely take this position as well. ignorance has never been a defensible strategy to avoid liability.
pick up a detonator, it's up to you to understand where the bombs are positions what's in the blast range.
https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-and-regulations/ba...
Liability always follows the human as has been the case with all tools, motor vehicles, and pets.
I just assumed tech enthusiasts who'd use this would be a more enlightened species
We're a real company :) (with health insurance!)
> With modern banking regulations and security procedures. I'm not even sure how that would be possible. Every bank account I've opened requires me to give them my photo ID and social security number, which AI agents don't have.
It's literally my job to know how it's possible, and to offer that up as a service with generous fees! Appreciate the input tho.
You are correct, KYC rules must be followed, and once you're off the waitlist (which we threw up last minute to make sure this system wasn't abused by an influx of demand) you'll be able to go through typical banking steps you're familiar with. We use persona as our KYC vendor and are highly sensitive about PII exposure.
> human would be opening a bank account...which isn't new.
An agent could open this bank account if you prefer to give it access to your social, passport, etc -- entirely up to the individual's risk profile.
What is new is a whole interface designed for an ai agent with guard rails to ensure it doesn't get itself in trouble by violating obscure BSA laws. Magnolia's job has always been to handle the compliance.
Seems like the case study is supposed to evaluate:
1. How does the candidate react to the problem 2. How do they identify “success metrics” 3. How well do they seek guidance from leadership 4. How do they go about poking at the problem 5. How do they go about constructing and validating a potential solution
I’m pretty early in my prep, so take this with a grain of salt.
For context. My background is engineering with a few yeo as TPM, the position is to lead a technical internal product with many technical challenges that may as well be considered product features
1. Unable to commit to a location long term (students, seasonal workers, people trying to find their fit)
2. Unable to fiscally purchase property (not everyone can just buy a condo
3. Unable to fiscally commit to a property/location - many people have dynamic incomes over time. What they can afford one year may not be the same the next.
Many people have unstable living situations one way or another, and I put myself in this category. People like the verbiage of “landlords do nothing” but in reality they take on the risk of property ownership so people forced to think short term don’t have to.
She’s conducted surveys and covered policies across the world from South America to Moscow (all this per Wikipedia).
I think she’s well qualified to provide opinion, not sure if I’ll take it - but that’s the point of an opinion piece.
What have you done to qualify yourself for your job? Except write snarky, poorly written and ill contributing comments on this forum for the last decade?
I don't think the being locked in a proprietary workflow bit is your real reason, because when you break it down - this doesn't make much sense. Fear of needing to switch workflows down the line outweighs the [potentially temporary if company dies] boost in productivity?
Of course, this assumes kite fits your workflow well and you find it delivers value (you don't cancel immediately)
Wow what a cherry picked example. I guess being a "democracy" should just magically solve a millennia of colonialism and thousands of years of rigid class hierarchy? And even if it absolutely should, the wealth gap in india is at an all time low due to Reservation policies.
> Sure, but the article is talking about riots and attacks. And it's a taiwanese company they are rioting against. The irony.
Yes, they haven't been paid for months. In india the workers don't take that sitting down.
> "China's policies of suppression". China's policies were copied from japan, korea, singapore, etc who in turned copied from the US. Parrots parroting.
Interesting, I never saw nets along the company housing in japan/us preventing workers from killing themselves, nor have I heard of american workers sneaking letters in products begging for help.
Also, I love how you're equating humans rights with "virtue signalling". Spoken exactly like a privelaged fool who doesn't understand the value of right, yet deems them unworthy for others.
Just in case this is somehow contestable, let me highlight a few points
* Climate change deniers oppose solutions that don't involve oil/gas/coal - this means nuclear power * Koch funding > greenpiece funding * greenpeice didn't start nuclear fear mongering, pro-oil lobbyists did - AKA climate change deniers.
Short answer? Yes. Especially if you have an accent. Less so if you don't, however I face plenty of exactly what the author speaks of when I went to my predominantly black college next door to a powerhouse technology school