Alonso is favored to replace him: https://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/34306151/alonso-ricciar...
1,360 karma · joined October 11, 2016
Alonso is favored to replace him: https://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/34306151/alonso-ricciar...
Apple makes $$$ from selling products people mostly love.
Google, Facebook/Meta make most of their cash from surveillance capitalism, I mean, advertising. Microsoft (tracking keystrokes in Windows) and Amazon (“we are a ‘data’ company”) also aren’t really privacy focused (though they do get chunks of income from actual products)
So I’m a bit torn with this legislation.
I’d say 50-50, they’d win!
But rather than stand-alone, it should be incorporated into publications.
In my experience, only a minority of applied machine learning papers provide even a minority of the info requested by the info sheet.
Meaning, you really have no proper idea how cross validation was done, what preprocessing was done etc. - in actually published papers
This is the author's notebook, which happens to be public. It's okay.
From the story, it looks like a benign email with an apropos quote.
But while that could’ve indeed been the email, maybe he was also going around saying Apple is done, come join me in my new gig, Ive is dumb, etc.
And team members then complained it hurt their morale.
So Dye and Ive put their door down.
I’m not saying this is what happened. But do we really know the full story?
Though if you ignore the specs, the M2 air (for 1500 so you get the same storage space), is probably equivalent – 8GB unified RAM and fast SSD seems equivalent to 16GB ram from decade ago.
Together with the improved software capabilities, I think the overall "experience" is "better" and you get more bang for buck.
Totally agree, plus Sirouji, who seems like a modern day wizard
Not just in academia, but also in biotech/pharma, where MDs or MBAs are too often the top dog.
This largely explains why Pharma and healthcare is so behind when it comes to tech
(Exceptions are the new, small biotechs. But the larger ones are more like dinosaurs)
But in the book, computation is one of the three braids comprising data science. And they include software engineering in computation.
See book sections 1.2, 1.2.4, 2.1.3 etc
—
What I am trying to untie is, should data engineering be distinguished from data science, or not?
Instead, it feels more like the end of “data science as the sexiest job of the 21st century”.
DS is mostly running reports (so BI) or stats (perennially important niche) or manufacturing hype via “latest research”.
Engineering has been, is, and will continue to be the foundation for success.
For me, python is mostly a calculator, and it seems faster to try a calculation and immediately see if it runs and/or looks correct, rather than try to implement type hints et al (though I still use type hints occasionally).
- ctrl option b, ctrl option f - ctrl a, e, k
Some GUIs and editors respect this, but it varies (Jupiter lab, emacs, GitHub.com text fields, etc)
Examples: search results in safari, search results in GitHub.com search.
Sadly, google chrome and apps like docs don't respect this
That info could help contextualize the entire piece.
They mostly use only email.
What is a more accessible alternative?
I’ve been trying google docs. Thoughts?