95 karma · joined July 22, 2010
Additionally, if you are backing up photos to a hard drive you will be much better off using an app like PhotoSync. It has a one time payment and transfers direct to whatever you want with far less errors and more control than Apple’s terrible buggy disaster that is transferring photos by wire.
My use case is scoring live events that may or may not have Internet connection. So normal usage is a single person but sometimes it would be nice to allow for multi person scoring without relying on centralized infrastructure.
https://www.amazon.com/Cell2jack-Cellphone-Adapter-Receive-l...
Basically use the dummy plug screen for PowerPoint’s output and the laptop screen for the presenter notes. Then share the dummy plug’s screen.
Might not be the best answer for the citizens of Hacker News but so, so easy for teachers and salespeople.
Select some photos and then select merge. The pop up that follows will let you merge only the exact duplicates.
So you can first merge all your exact duplicates, and then when that is done manually review the visually similar matches.
(Teams makes this Byzantine in the extreme to accomplish as you have to go find the folder it drops all shared files in to gain access to manage access settings. But it does allow you to retro change access even for things shared in Teams)
Mylio stores “Live Photos” as Photo.extension <- the “photo” it shows in the interface Photo.xmp <- all the metatdata Photo.myb <- everything else
Literally the myb is just a zip of everything else associated with the photo. So in the “Live Photo” case that would be the associated video file. If you have edited the file in Apple photos that also includes the XML Apple uses to non destructively perform the edit. As well as a copy of the original photo.
In your case you could just manually create the myb file by zipping up all the associated extra photos and changing the extension. However the interface would only show the single main photo.
Lessons Learned
We believe that all of the vulnerabilities we discovered have been mitigated by Threema's recent patches. This means that, at this time, the security issues we found no longer pose any threat to Threema customers, including OnPrem instances that have been kept up-to-date. On the other hand, some of the vulnerabilities we discovered may have been present in Threema for a long time.
> Ledgers are conceptually a data model, represented by three entities: Accounts, Entries and Transactions.
> Most people think of money in terms of what’s theirs, and Accounts are the representation of that point of view. They are the reason why engineers naturally gravitate towards the “simplicity” of single-entry systems. Accounts are both buckets of value, and a particular point of view of how its value changes over time.
> Entries represent the flow of funds between Accounts. Crucially, they are always an exchange of value. Therefore, they always come in pairs: an Entry represents one leg of the exchange.
> The way we ensure that Entries are paired correctly is with Transactions. Ledgers shouldn’t interact with Entries directly, but through the Transaction entity.
The backup situation is terrible - Mac only - Only Passwords (no passkeys) - Only items you created (so nothing shared with you, even if you own the shared “group”)
In short your only option is one at a time manual export
I have lyrics that I want sung by a solo female voice with the background being a male chorus. Something reminiscent of a woman singing the details of a David vs Goliath type battle backed by a chorus of the victorious warriors from that battle.
So far I have completely failed to be able to generate a female lead with a male chorus backing
JustBeamIt
- Site: https://justbeamit.com
- Source: https://github.com/justbeamit/beam
P.S. Using this has made it clear to me how bad most sunrise/sunset calculators actually are.
If I'm understanding the problem right a malicious user, uses the same source id to send action a to user 1 and action b to user 2. This has started two independent (and currently indistinguishable branches in your DAG) When those branches come into contact at say user 3 weird bugs start arising.
However, user 3 is receiving a DAG of all the operations along with the operations. Can't it use that to validate the DAG chain? If it finds a conflict it could simply create a branch at the conflict point by modifying the IDs at the point of conflict. Say by appending a hash of just that operation to the id?