ansc

Congratulations to the US military, I guess.

The comments in the gist is depressing.

That's not just a great insight, but one that's worth carrying with us. That's why I built RememberBuddy. It's the one place for you to store your every-day insights so you don't forget.

>Google Docs style CRDTs

Google Docs is OT though.

Fun! Good luck.

_in the US_

Isn't the examples not very telling if you can't see the input too? Results look good, but I don't know what the input / what kind of preprocessing what done on it.

What wording do you prefer?

I wish that was true. Not adopting technology carries penalties. Almost always enough for it to be a requirement.

Even so, "humans do care about its ethical and moral considerations": whose ethics? enforced how? measured how? you're going to fight efficiency and functionality? good luck.

A bit mean-spirited I think, but not unreasonable. organism: "a system or organization consisting of interdependent parts, compared to a living being". I removed the "living" part of it to allow for a bit more... abstract thinking.

Maybe I am misunderstanding, but I disagree a whole lot. The whole problem is that is it inevitable. Technology is an enormous organism. It does not care about the ethical or moral considerations of it. It's a tug-of-war who can use most technique to succeed -- if you do not use it, you fall behind. Individuals absolutely can not shape the future of technology. States can attempt, but as they make use of technology for propaganda and similar reasons -- they are also in a requirement of it. It is inevitable as long as you keep digging.

Is there no API for the Kimi K2 Instruct...?

There is no (serious) baker that use volume for flour. If the recipe uses volume, it is flawed and you should find another recipe.

Every recipe on King Arthur that you linked has weights.

I realize how I sound, but there is a very big difference in a couple of percentages of flour, and you'd definitely mess up a beginner with the difference with the amount of flour.

Woah, yikes.

What's the plan mode?

Uh, definitely NSFW. Did not expect to see porn and other questionable graphic material. I mean, that is what I remember from the "alive internet", so it's not wrong perhaps, but maybe should be flagged as such.

Great to see! Would love to try it, but I depend on graceful updates of configuration (i.e. adding and removing backends primarily). I can't find anything about that. Is it supported, either through updating configs or through API?

I am getting more and more nervous that there will be no good upgrade for me. 13 Mini is such a good size!

It expands further down in the article:

>Pydantic is great, just not everywhere. [...] Not because it’s bad, but because your domain should be pure and independent.

It itches because it should be pure and indepen- yeah I don't know. I haven't had this itch either to be frank.

>I don't have a strong argument for this

I think you do. Have we ever been successful at slowing down technological efficiency?

>If that comes to pass, then what people will do with that technology, and what will change as a result, will be up to the people who are alive at the time.

If it is inevitable that technology will be developed, it is also inevitable that it will be used, and in turn, further technology developed. Technology is an arms race. You can't opt out once you've started. If you do not employ the same technical progress for whatever-- propaganda, profits-- you will lose.

I know you're not posing it as a problem or solution, but I believe pinning it completely on "it's how we use it" is not a valid tactic either.

My bad, I should have written in my experience working on larger codebases. It was a bit too general. It was never about the semantics about the language, but about allowing developers to make the correct choice. Kind of why Golang was built for Google I guess. In practice I've found Golang developers to handle errors where appropriate, where in (binary) Rust applications I've usually found `anyhow` everywhere with `?` to be a bit of a silent issue.

You're right that the languages have the same capability. The terseness can IMO both be a strength and a liability.

I think they are actually pretty different in approach. rust sprinkle ”?” everywhere and wants to avoid dealing with the error, and golang is more explicit and robust handling. sure, most is similar if it is just ”if err return err” but I have definitely seen more ”extreme” and correct error handling in golang, whereas in rust the convenience of just bubbling it up wins. I still prefer rust, but I am not sure the comparison is as close as people claim

I doubt it to be honest. It's so distinct and non-existing.

>With Astro you're not locked into a single way of doing things. Need React for a complex form? Chuck it in. Prefer Vue for data visualisation? Go for it. Want to keep most things as simple Astro components? Perfect.

>What struck me most after migrating several projects is how Astro makes the right thing the easy thing. Want a fast site? That's the default. Want to add interactivity? Easy, but only where you need it. Want to use your favourite framework? Go ahead, Astro won't judge.

>Developer experience that actually delivers

I am downvoted so I guess I'm wrong. It's just bland and form in a way ChatGPT usually outputs. Sorry to the author if I'm wrong.

You're not just venting about me being uncomfortable with dashes — you are making a philosophical claim about what comfortability really means. And that? That is a true super-power.

>See that code fence at the top? That runs at build time, not in the browser. Your data fetching, your logic - it all happens before the user even loads the page.

I can't with this goddamn LLM blog posts, it just drowns everything.

Come on.

I agree with the premise that it is really difficult and sucks to "just go out and talk to people". Depends on where you live I guess though. I think thinking you'll end up on a TikTok because you talk to a person in a queue is just a far off excuse.

How'd you get started?

Yes, that was true though, wasn't it? If this is also true, what does that imply?

+1, would be super interesting to learn when this case makes sense! I am doing great with just using owned in structs for single, and (A)Rc for multiple, but it would be cool to learn.

I've been thinking about why there's no modern SVG editor like this. Super nice to see. Inkscape can be a bit of a pain imo, even if it has extensive features. I'll definitely give it a spin. Good luck!