IMO Lisp's is hard, but simple; Python's is hard and complex.
Tooling can make it easier (keeping track of parentheses and significant whitespace, respectively), but not simpler.
429 karma · joined December 30, 2021
IMO Lisp's is hard, but simple; Python's is hard and complex.
Tooling can make it easier (keeping track of parentheses and significant whitespace, respectively), but not simpler.
For example, maybe you can use something like the Reed–Solomon error correction, which allows you to balance between no redundancy and full duplication, both in cost and benefit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed%E2%80%93Solomon_error_cor...
I don't know about string theory, but this is totally wrong. Exploiting a simple correlation gives you the ability to predict to a certain extent, but that's not science, that's numerology. I couldn't find the source of the quote, but I looked up the guy and found what I expected. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hoyle#Other_controversies:
Hoyle also supported the following controversial hypotheses and speculations:
The correlation of flu epidemics with the sunspot cycle, with epidemics occurring at the minimum of the cycle. The idea was that flu contagion was scattered in the interstellar medium and reached Earth only when the solar wind had minimum power.
[...]
The box is also not necessarily like your average shoe box, I'd guess it's much smaller (millimeters), show it's not shown on the video directly, up close.
Well, it can be played in Australia only if its DVD region code is 4, and it cannot be played in any other countries you mentioned, which are all in different regions (USA: 1; China: 6; India: 5; the Netherlands and Japan: 2). So there's that. "A miracle of interoperability."
> As for military affairs, even after the dissolution of the USSR and losing a considerable part of its capabilities, today’s Russia remains one of the most powerful NUCLEAR states. Moreover, it has a certain advantage in several cutting-edge weapons. In this context, there should be no doubt for anyone that any potential aggressor will face defeat and ominous consequences should it directly attack our country.
> As for military affairs, even after the dissolution of the USSR and losing a considerable part of its capabilities, today’s Russia remains one of the most powerful NUCLEAR states. Moreover, it has a certain advantage in several cutting-edge weapons. In this context, there should be no doubt for anyone that any potential aggressor will face defeat and ominous consequences should it directly attack our country.
This sounds like a very wrong approach to optimization. I mean, if you don't know exactly what and how to optimize, or if there's a need for optimization at all, then what are you doing?
Ah, the elusive quadruple-negative.