2,207 karma · joined June 2, 2009
http://www.remindem.com/remind/alex
However, they could potentially turn the traffic into something real in the campus dating space.
I'm not long, but it's a cool idea and a nicely executed site.
A lot of these arguments could be made for any product or service. If you pay more for your house, does it mean that you will live happier? No. You may be much happier in central Montana than New York. If you pay more for your clothes, do they look better? If you pay more for your music, do you enjoy it more?
The whole debate is non-sense. Any consumer who thought they were necessarily getting better wine simply because they paid more probably is not literate enough to have understood this article.
What needs to be studied is if there is a correlation between price amd consumer preference. As far as I can tell, this was not an effort to do that, but rather to prove the obvious: you can't taste price. This is true for any kind of food.
Can you look at two pieces of art and tell which is ore expensive? No. Is better art more expensive? Sometimes, usually yes, and often eventually. Same can be said for wine. Price is a product of demand, demand depends on information and information distribution. Both products are small batch and highly personal, so price quality correlations will be less accurate and change over time.
I've read this type of study several times - either I have especially sensitive taste or there is something wrong with the studies because it is simply not true that there is no correlation between taste and price.
Can I tell the difference between a $15 bottle and a $40 bottle? No, I don't taste price. Are as many $15 bottles excellent as $40 bottles? Absolutely not.
One flaw: if you pick a random $40 bottle and a random $15 bottle and ask someone which they like, this is not a valid study. You need to pick a wine that both costs $40 AND IS WORTH $40 and likewise a wine that's WORTH $15. Just because a wine is $90 doesn't mean it's great, but if a wine is $2 it probably sucks.
The correlation is there and pretty strong, particularly when moving from $2 to $8 to $15, but it is not perfect. Price != taste.
A few years ago, the micro-blogging community was not big enough for a second player. Now it is, and Twitter will change or be overtaken by a more compelling alternative.
The simplicity of Twitter was once its strength, but like any technology, it must grow to meet the demands of its users. Facebook added chat, photos, a compelling platform, etc... Twitter is dead in the water right now.
Who wants to remember silly @handles? There isn't even a directory of official Twitter handles for companies.
Private group message applications are sprouting up everywhere - Twitter is just plodding along unaware that this is a huge need.
Who wants to see hideous bit.ly links instead of actual content?
Is 140 characters really the future? I doubt it.
Are third party services really necessary to embed media? Do users really need to figure out how to tape together 10 different services and clients to get a good experience?
Twitter needs to grow up, or it will die. And it will happen quickly - less than two years from the day a serious competitor gains steam.
Using JRuby or a REST API to a Rails app is the kind of complication to an app you desperately want to avoid.
Btw, I was a java developer for 6 years. I was looking forward to type checking, but the closed community was too much to handle after experiencing the ruby world.
The question seems pretty specific:
I'm looking for a Java payment gateway library similar to the Rails active_merchant or the libraries available on many other platforms. I've been surprised that I've been unable to find one. I'd like something that supports the major gateways and providers, like Paypal, Google, Amazon, and some direct merchant account providers like Authorize.net.
Does such a thing exist in the open source world?
Search stack overflow for java payment gateway library and you will find my as-yet unanswerred question. The java community seems much more intent on monetizing libraries and having annoying restrictions - in ruby shit is just out there.
I actually much prefer Scala as a language (although Play support was not ready then). Ruby is a dog in many ways and common practices in the ruby world are completely against my philosophy, but hey, it works and I know it.
I'd definitely recommend checking out Play and Scala.
Between yaml, sass (although not scss), haml, and coffescript, is the next step a version of ruby getting rid of end statements in favor of whitespace? I've often dreamed of such a thing.
module Foo
module Bar
class Fubar
def boom
p "I like monkey patches"
end
end
end
end
Ick!Really nothing unusual here. I can see why they would not be interested in learning more.
You have backups of the code - can you explain why it isn't a pretty straightforward process to set up a new server? The fact that you have a fixed IP address has no importance as far as I can tell, and that's the only explanation offered.
> It would have taken us months to get TinyGrab v1 back up to scratch
Really?
"If you have previously agreed to us using your personal information for direct marketing purposes, you may change your mind at any time by writing to or emailing us at marketing@albogari.com"
Case in point of building features valuable to customers and the company before those that are not. Why is there no feature on this website to unsubscribe from marketing, just as there is to subscribe? Because it's work to build one, and it doesn't have immediate benefit to the company.
On a side note, as CEO of a 35 year old international holding company - I find it odd that Omar is claiming to be the "little guy" in this thread.
We've also had issues with what seem to be targetted 1 star ratings with no reviews. Every new version that comes out we instantly get a bunch of these, and I have suspicions about who they come from. Almost all written reviews are 4 or 5 stars.
If the journal is not credible, has published unreliable science in the past, has a stated agenda, and does not have an above-board peer-review process, then it is no more worthy of trust than the World News Daily.
Undermining the credibility of the journal a paper is published in is fair game when the credibility of the journal is the only reason any credibility is assigned to the paper.