747 karma · joined August 25, 2007
For more: Https://andrewparker.net
For example, $43,100 in consumer debt per capita seems totally unsustainable, and one way it might get corrected is through very high inflation, which would make our past debt more reasonable by comparison. So investments that perform well in inflationary periods would make sense... Other ideas?
1. I'm sure compounded returns would be nice to do, but you don't know the start date for any of those investments. A 2004 vintage fund does not mean the investments are from 2004. Instead, it means the fund made it's first investment in 2004 and will continue deploying money over ~7-8 years.
2. In the VC industry, a wipeout is a wipeout. Call it Zero, not 0.5x.
3. LPs care more about cash-on-cash multiples, not compounded returns (aka IRR). There's an expression that will help explain this point: "You can't eat IRR." VC is a 10-year horizon business and GPs call do special moves to improve the IRR (calling down capital as needed, and then returned capital upon exit even if it's going to be called down again and reinvested). But, at the end of the day, the best measure of the success of any fund is the gross cash-on-cash multiple of the entire fund.
Also, the "date" column doesn't sort properly. It sorta alphanumerically instead of chronologically.
Doesn't support write quite like that yet ;)
I'd personally recommend not finishing this "More Videos" feature. I think the simplicity of just 1 video per search is awesome and creates beautiful serendipity. But, I know such a suggestion is very subjective.
That said, I have not noticed the quality issues the original author laments.
Sergey and Larry have something like 30% of the equity combined but held 85% of the voting power.
Jobs at portfolio cos: http://bit.ly/8ueLw8
But, they are logical IMHO. You get about 25 hours worth of advice from Saul's high-value network of entrepreneurs and investors. In exchange for this advice, Seedcamp gets an option to invest at a reasonable valuation given the stage of the companies that attend.
Rather than make this option a legal Security in your company, they take you at your word. Seems better than wasting everyone's time with legal fees to actually formalize this option.
Is Saul's post true? Where's the ambiguity?