804 karma · joined March 28, 2008
contact me: andresbarreto [a] techstars com
I know it's early, but my only other obstacle is that those students are mostly Windows or Ubuntu :/ Although I totally understand focusing on MacOS
Buy
“Happiest baby on the block” book
And buy
“Sleepea”
It’s like magic to get your baby to fall asleep and stop crying in less than 60 seconds
Assume the stock grant was 48,000 if you have after the day after you completed 12 months, you get to keep 12,000 shares not 24,000.
In terms of taxes, you have to file an “83b election” with the IRS to prevent being liable for “paper wealth” that’s not really cash
Technically you are granted all 48,000 shares at a nominal value like .00001 and the company has the automatic right to buy back the shares you do not vest at that same nominal value
It seems that what you are looking at is a breach of contract where the company did not deliver what they agreed to deliver.
If the company ran out of money, they are probably a dead company/ bankrupt and have or will shut down. They are unlikely to be able to return the money or deliver, and you could end up either trying to sue a company that is dead and/or pierce the corporate veil alleging fraud.
Check with your lawyers.
Then understand that what both of you should have done is 4 years vesting with 12-month cliff.
With that come to an agreement that since you did two years, you should keep only half of your equity (20%), freeing up the remaining 20% so Jim can acquire better talent.
Long version (Excerpt from a post I wrote):
"These are the legal concepts you can use to protect founders from each other, the company from the founders and founders from a hostile board.
Let's run an Example assuming I'll be your co-founder and the company will grant me 48,000 shares for each of the legal concepts (The number 48,000 was chosen to simply math but does not reflect typical number of shares per founder):
1. Cliff
• If founder stays less than 12 months, no equity.
Example: In this case I receive 0 of my 48,000 shares.
• After 12 months 25% of stock is instantly vested.
Example: In this case I receive 12,000 shares of my 48,000 shares.
2.Vesting
• After the cliff, founder vests 1/36th of granted stock each month.
Example: In this case I receive 1,000 shares a month, on top of my previously earned 12,000 shares after the cliff for a total of 48,000 shares over a total of four years. If I leave in month 24 my total number of shares is 24,000.
3. Acceleration Triggers
• Single trigger: all stock is vested upon change of control or sale of the company.
Example: Let's say Google buys our company in my month 24 of vesting, in order to prevent google from firing me right after the acquisition in order to stop my remaining 24,000 shares from vesting, all my shares accelerate are granted immediately, thus accelerating the vesting
• Double trigger: some stock is vested upon termination without just cause.
Example: This provides a dis-incentive from investors, the board, or a co-founder from firing me if I am not done vesting, in order to free up equity to hire a lot more other people, if I am fired and it's not due to committing a crime like fraud then I will earn some stock, normally 12 months, without having to remain at the company for 12 months."
Even longer version: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/startup-survival-guide-recrui...
I think you might just be in the wrong silo. I've reached out to directly via DM on twitter.
Also, relevant https://techcrunch.com/2019/08/21/andrew-ngs-ai-companies-ex...
Sanctions are placed on enemies not allies
Otherwise, make this your full time job and make sure you have enough income to wait 8-10 years before you start seeing return.
You can also invest in a first time fund, where the manager will charge 2% management fee and 20% carry (success fee).
Getting access to entrepreneurs depends on your geography but generally if you make yourself useful to entrepreneurs, with or without investing, you can start generating dealflow.
Start with small checks, you will mess up in the beginning, so make these mistakes less painful.
Read venture deals and watch all the videos from YC investor school.
"For debatable values of "doing fine"." It's doing better politically, and economically than most countries in Latin America. Almost any value that you evaluate it by, its doing fine compared to most countries in the Americas.
You have to deliberately go into the wrong neighborhood and mess with the wrong people.
Every time I’m in SF I’m on edge when I walk in the street.
In Medellin I feel safe walking around with AirPods and iphone out, plus I’m not on defensive mode ready to dodge feces or harassment.
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/060415/can-foreign-...