1,439 karma · joined February 19, 2011
Previously: founder @ LeadGenius (YCS11), PhD @ Berkeley.
Computer scientist. AAAI HCOMP is my home conference.
http://www.crowdbotics.com
talk to me: anand [at] crowdbotics.com
Thanks, John Cook!
It's beautiful, elegant, and easy to understand. I was introduced to the proof by a note in Sipser's text.
Excited to see what you do next.
When astrophysicists work on this activity, they use (no surprise) computer vision. The lab's software automated the process these nova hunters ran manually: we subtracted two images of every segment of the night sky taken on different dates to see if any new bright objects appeared in the difference. If so, it's possibly a supernovae!
Because there are so many stars out there you can use this method to predictably discover large numbers of supernovae when you need to study them. They called the project the Nearby Supernova Factory ( https://snfactory.lbl.gov/ ); as far as I know this is still the preferred method.
https://design.crowdbotics.com
These examples were originally selected by Kesler Tanner over at the Stanford Institute of Design. They represent what's going on as of mid-2017 in landing page design. The one shift that I've seen since this collection was last updated is the migration to bolder, more contrast-heavy color palettes that make use of more illustrations. Intercom and Dropbox's current sites are good examples here.
There are a few different business models possible:
* When ICOs are issued, tokens are sold in exchange for other currency (typically BTC, ETH, or fiat currency like USD). The reason is to have more-established forms of money available to pay developers working on the technology, so this means you can actually pay people conventional cash (in the short term).
* In the long term, most protocol developers monetize via software built on top of the underlying technology or powering the underlying technology. BlockCypher is one example (https://www.blockcypher.com/) You can offer pro versions if folks run them internally for a fee.
* It's also common to offer consulting/human services related to technology you developed. (https://gem.co/ is a good example)
* Decentralized protocols don't mean you can't take a cut of transactions – they mean everyone has a chance to take a cut of transactions! Most blockchains call these "miners" and open it up to everyone, but the initial protocol developer may also set up/offer a pool to take advantage of this process. This happens quite often with industrial/commercial blockchain used by larger industry groups.
* More generally, technology running on open protocols can be centralized/proprietary even if the underlying tech is open – the same rules apply. TCP/IP and HTTP are open and decentralized, but we have plenty of money-making businesses here on the web!
Go Chris & Darby!
One of the interesting things that Kip solves is discovery: it seems like they have a roster of prequalified therapists who follow evidence-based strategies. That's pretty interesting – the basic process of finding a qualified therapist who's a good fit via the usual methods (Google, asking people) isn't easy.
The conventional wisdom in the last ten years for new startup products are that you should open discussions with initial customers yourself.
This kind of early customer development lets you prove your hypotheses around the product having demand before investing in expensive promotional spending.
If you're concerned about it, then just make sure the IP doesn't live entirely in the extension itself with a simple third-party authentication & payment system.
There are more than a few companies set up like this already. SalesLoft started as a paid Chrome extension!
Feel free to email me with questions. If you'd rather just hire one of our remote developers and not deal with the paperwork yourself, that's another option. We manage contracts with clients as a US company to insulate them from needing to set up 1-1 relationships with devs.
Another way to think about it is like this: if an investor told you tomorrow they'd no longer contribute to the company, versus your first engineer, which would be more damaging? The investor's money is already in the bank, whereas the engineer will cost time and money to replace, as well as disrupting the ongoing development.
If you were to define a new standard milestone for "success", what would it be? Revenue, for B2B companies, and active user growth rate for B2C?