don't underestimate the capabilities of `volunteers', or floss developers; nearly 30 years of apple software was thrown away again and again, and apple jumped to something new without much backward compatibility. So, they enabling sophisticated development by paying is a temporary illusion.
as far as i understand freebsd is there just because some license fanatics want to maintain a commercial-izable alternative to linux. they switching to clang doesn't mean much, because it is most probably a dogmatic, ideological move.
I gave this as an introductory read to our junior web marketing team. it would be really nice to have a bootstrap landing page and I am surprised why Google does not provide such resources?
is this really an argument against what super_mario says? when he says it doesnt have a plugin architecture of course he means extendibility by everyone.
The whole idea of open source is here in trimbo's comment. Android does not empower even Google to a total control; anybody forks (Amazon, Nook) does what they want. iOS can't do this.
Love & hate as an argument is recently a lot common at HN, especially MG is making headlines several times a month, with just another way to show his love for Apple and hate for .. anything else.
apple has the pr money to create status gadgets and use the profit to attack alll kinds of efforts in reverse direction, to show the users that their gadget is not superior but defected by design because it takes their freedom to install what they want..
if we lived in an apple dominated space even the web browser risks being banned and i m sure some of the end users you mention would applaud it.
people like rms are there to wake us from short sighted dreams.
Totally agree, i hope unity will shine, my adding more and more goodies. On my tablet i would really want to have a full linux, if that is at all possible.