To me they look similarly complicated and the examples stresses certain aggregation operations that are harder to do in jq (due to it being stateless).
935 karma · joined September 23, 2016
To me they look similarly complicated and the examples stresses certain aggregation operations that are harder to do in jq (due to it being stateless).
(I'm the original author)
I live in Barcelona, and the rental market is crazy. Technically I should be allowed to sign a contract for 5 years, but because of the rights that kick in after 12 months, there's a ton of landlords that only want to offer 11 month contracts.
I'm also playing on PS5 and had zero crashes so far (20+ hours).
Pop-in, flicker and shimmering? It feels like I'm playing a different game to you.
Wonder if that means it would be easier to verify the correctness of `unsafe` use inside Rust itself?
Where does your limit go for that? I wrote a eurorack modular embedded thing on Teensy 4.0 (imxrt) in Rust this year. I just inspected the dep tree, it's 38 crates, with 1 being my own.
https://gist.github.com/algesten/9617fc795f2fc94009f1ed311b1...
It was a joy to write this in Rust, I look forward to my next project. This was done with "stable" (not nightly).
https://internal.yourcompany.com/oauth2/callback?token…
That token in the callback does not require any kind of cookie to use for subsequent authenticated calls.
A fifth might even sound off key if you're very used to equal temperament (it's about 2 cents below an equal temperament). You know it by there being no or less "wobbling" between the tones.
For listening tips, look for vocalist groups where there's "One Voice Per Part" (OVPP). Voces8, Vox Luminis, etc. When there's only one voice, you don't get the inherent wobbling happening when two instruments/voices play in unison.
Not all genres are possible to have just (jazz chord colors would sound rubbish).
Plenty of music around that is recorded using actual perfect intervals, so why muddy the waters?
For example, the current British PM does not understand why reciting Rudyard Kipling in Myanmar is a problem (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/sep/30/boris-johns...) and he wrote a book elevating his idol Churchill (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Churchill_Factor). He really only thinks of Churchill as someone who "saved civilization", while ignoring that Churchill also caused millions of deaths (Bengal famine, etc) – "the Aryan stock is bound to triumph".
By ignoring historical facts and not recognizing that the UK is directly to blame for a lot of death and suffering in India, Africa, and all other places the empire touched, has consequences also today. For example, BLM also made it to the UK, however the situation for black people in the UK is quite different to the US. Probably because Boris ignores lots of historical facts, he doesn't even understand the first thing of BLM UK (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/08/i-hear-you-b...)
I'm focusing on Boris Johnson here, but his government is largely made up of long time friends from similar backgrounds with shared values.
Ignoring relevant historical context of Alan Turing is an example of larger problem in the current UK government. Gay rights are better today than 1950s, but it's by no means a solved problem. Hate crimes against LGBT are increasing (sexual orientation motivated crimes increasing more than for race and trans is even worse https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/...).
Thinking about it, I might just do that when I get back home :)
(i.e. you're unlikely to most of the time be in the middle of a lake, farm field etc)
as a european I'm totally ok without this support.
It's like the cost of eating lunch out three times in a big city.
Given the amount of work put into drawing icons, I'd say it's fair. I'm absolutely thrilled someone found a way to charge for something that is a personal project and not backed by some big corporate marketing buck.
DTLS is however fully used for SCTP, which the protocol for data channels alongside the media streams.
Stuff like that happen. We should only judge them if they screw up like that again.
So just because every system has flaws, we should throw in the towel and give up? Taking that line of thinking all the way means we can just replace university allocations with a lottery.
That's not how society works.
Even if every system have flaws, even if the current suffers from racism and classism, we have to strive towards making it better. The system the UK invented here does not even try. It very clearly favors people with nice postcodes.
Maybe we should replace it with a lottery, it would be equal. But I'm pretty sure the people with nice postcodes would like it much, and that's the people propping up the UK gov. Etonians, Oxford, silver spoon etc.
I for one believe there must be _some way_ to fix the situation and is better than what they came up with.