I'm not a big fan of his generally, but I highly recommend this book in particular. A lot of what he wrote there really resonated for me.
1,688 karma · joined January 10, 2017
// Alexander Dmitri is property of Gala Corp.
(function (self) {
console.time("lifetime");
try {
while self.alive {
self.wakeUp();
self.doStuff();
self.sleep();
}
}
catch (fatalError) {
console.error(`Whoops! ${fatalError}`);
}
finally {
self = null;
console.timeEnd("lifetime");
}
}(self));I'm not a big fan of his generally, but I highly recommend this book in particular. A lot of what he wrote there really resonated for me.
Why did you create us? Why do you hide in the shadows?!
Sure they could beat the odds on either issue when get older, but it's tough when you live in a system that works against you. It's good to say individuals should hold themselves accountable and not give up in the face of adversity, but from a macro-level it doesn't help fix the problem. I'd argue the your fault / deal with it attitude on these trends make those problems worse for a population.
[0] https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood-obesity-facts/childhoo...
[1] https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/17/nih-di...
i'm not sure this is correct. i bet it often comes down to whether we've found an [emotionally] satisfying answer/outcome.
[0] https://electrek.co/2022/05/25/tesla-updates-car-software-re...
[0]: https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2006/new-york-city-adm...
https://qz.com/2139399/surging-nickel-prices-are-bad-news-fo...
[0] https://www.osc.state.ny.us/files/reports/osdc/pdf/report-11...
It's not all good though ... people who play Call of Duty are more likely to default on their loans and World of Warcraft is well known to have a strong correlation with sexual predators. Banks and FBI buy the relatively cheap video game data and use it to decide which individual's browsing history ($$$) and pc usage telemetry ($$$) to buy from Microsoft.
I can see people having different opinions of this trend. What is your take on it?
Curbing people's ability to leverage poverty traps for profit in a capitalist system would reduce how many people get stuck in them.
In general, government legislation can and does directly affect poverty rates as well as who is most likely to be affected.
People will argue about the effectiveness and intent of government actions to ameliorate/impose poverty. Claiming that it is outside of a government's influence is nonsense.
Maybe it's a problem with Twitter as a medium in general? People over analyze these snippets and ultimately derive whatever they want to. Suddenly things like kidnapping, brutal rape and children dying of malaria start coming up and that's intense.
The weirdest thing is seeing Twitter appear in more and more journalism. BBC constantly references tweets in it's articles[0], I'm not sure why. A good tweet says nothing, suggests everything, gets people emotional and puts isolated individuals into a mob mentality. It's like a retirement home for pregnant mares.
I also had something about propaganda versus journalism, but I'm kinda tripping out here and losing my threads. John could probably say this better than me. Brb.
This is a take on the issue by the Seattle Times: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/homeless/why-are-p...
Just as remorse should lead to rectifying action, thankfulness should lead to reciprocal action to provide objective value.
What's interesting is the impetus between internal perception and outward action both share is a sense of indebtedness. Thankfulness becomes a passive accumulation of debt in this lens, whereas remorse casts our hero in a more active role.
I think also actions spawned from thankfulness will be more comedic [dynamic] in nature and whereas those from remorse will tend toward the tragic [static]. The efficacy of either approach will reflect the constraints of the systems they are acting within and how well conceived the individual's solution is.
Not sure where I'm going with this. Spitballing, not preaching ...