606 karma · joined October 19, 2020
The US regressed on this heavily in the last generation.
China is by far the biggest carbon emitter. People try to obscure that through "per capita" and "historical cumulative" figures and "percentage improvement".
The way people contort themselves to protect China, the mega-emitter is laughable. They improved 2.7%!! So they went from 31% to 30.92% of total manmade CO2?
You're not serious about the climate, you just want to punish the US/West.
Do they get to advance until they're in first place? And then what? It stops there or does India get a shot at being first place? Then Nigeria?
Meanwhile what does the climate look like if every single country executes the China 1945-2025 playbook?
This obscures the numbers. The climate doesn't care about improvement, only about total tons of CO2.
Does the climate care about per capita? no
Every benefit must be judged by its cost.
Housing costs are by far the largest line item expense for a student. Actual tuition/books is pretty affordable [1]
This has nothing to do with profitability. DoD/War Dept contracts are "tax payer money" and shareholders are happy to have those.
>it is actually cheaper to run 10 KILOMETERS / 6 Miles of Fiber cable through the jungle
Cheaper, sure. But try getting this approved in the US through a County Planning Commission. And you did get NEPA/CEQA done too right?
>No, not rural USA. Fiber will be cheaper.
My not-that-rural town has fiber only 80% of town. Houses with city sewer/water don't have fiber
Currently enjoying a Pro Max and loving it, but I'll hate everything about it in two years and go for the smallest current gen iphone
so yeah, that's kinda the whole game