[0] Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Facebook addiction: Concerns, criticism, and recommendations: A response to Andreassen and colleagues. Psychological Reports, 110, 518–520. https://doi.org/10.2466/01.07.18.PR0.110.2.518-520
1,038 karma · joined January 12, 2010
[0] Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Facebook addiction: Concerns, criticism, and recommendations: A response to Andreassen and colleagues. Psychological Reports, 110, 518–520. https://doi.org/10.2466/01.07.18.PR0.110.2.518-520
I would typically need to quickly import calendar files related to the various online events I have to take part. And the planner should account for the differences in time zones, so that I do not have to.
A cryptographic hash function – SHA-256 included – is not inverted, because any "good" cryptographic hash function has probably infinitely many pre-images for any given hash value, if the input space is unbounded (i.e., {0,1}*).
This can be used, for instance, by gig workers to deliver documents to their clients, while conditioning the retrieval of such documents to a payment.
BCS units were running Olivetti BCOS 5 on NEC 8080 (2 Mhz), 64Kb RAM.
[1] http://museo.dagomari.prato.it/singolo.php?cod=149&ord=1
On a related note, I will spend all night hacking CSS to prove myself I can do the same. Sleep debt does not scary me out.
If we were to offset our carbon footprint, we would be in the market for offsetting strategies most likely in commodity form – which is to say products and services. But, wait, it was exactly swiping our credit cards that we got in this sorrow state for the climate. We have to rethink all of this. Indeed, 'Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.'; this applies also to market economies.
[0] https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/news.html#v4b
[0] https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/just-8-men-own-same-...
[1] https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/worlds-billionaires-...
While there is no background information about the game in the DKC repository at the moment, the game comes with a set of cards where the equipment, rules, and finishing criteria are described [1]. If there is interested for that, I will add more context on the game and its contribution towards understanding secure multi-party computations for the youngest. I may still have the slide deck I used to present this work at the end of the hackathon, which may provide some further introductory material.
[1] DKC's rules https://github.com/secYOUre/DKC/tree/master/self-print/300-d...
[0] Dining Kid-Cryptographers, https://github.com/secYOUre/DKC
Answer found in the linked paper:
"""
For many devices, the IMEI can be changed through soft- ware, often without root access. We envision a PGPP MVNO would allow for subscribers to present their unchanged de- vice IMEI, giving the PGPP operator the opportunity to check against a EIR to verify the phone has not been reported as stolen. At that point, the IMEI could be reprogrammed to a single value, similar to our changes to the SUPI. Additionally, PGPP users can readily switch SIMs to different handsets (IMEIs) at-will. Note that different jurisdictions have differ- ent rules about whether, how, and by whom an IMEI can be changed, so only in some cases IMEI changes require cooper- ation with the MVNO.
...
A PGPP-based carrier is data-only, with voice and messaging provided by third parties.
"""
So, the next question is: if voice is provided by third parties (i.e., relies on the actual IMSI/IMEI), what stops the mobile operator from correlating the presence of the IMSI/IMEI to the ephemeral IMSIs/IMEIs, so as to infer the real network identity behind the randomised IDs?
Anyone with knowledge of the room UUID can listen to the conversation, even though the presence of the eavesdropper may (or may not) show up in the connected peers' counter. It is of essence to share such UUIDs over a secure channel, or the communication security will be compromised trivially.
It is mentioned in the README the relevance of government level threat actors and email, SMS, Discord, among the possible mediums over which the UUIDs can be shared. Of course this leaves Chitchatter open to be attacked by governments and network operators, who do have access to the phone network(s), email servers, and other platforms involved. It would be best to prefer other out-of-bound channels, or come up with one-time UUIDs generators able to resynchronise and shared among the peers.