2,862 karma · joined May 14, 2021
That doesn’t seem beneficial to workers as a whole. I thought innovation was supposed to benefit everyone? Where’s the hole in this logic?
Doesn’t owning a thing like that sound like being arbitrarily wealthy? What do you think the three people in the US who control more wealth than the entire bottom 50% of Americans would think about that? You think they’ll just say “Nah, I don’t want that. I won’t take steps to control this particular life-altering technology?”
If so, you are making an extraordinarily strong claim, and such claims must be supported by extraordinarily strong evidence, which I see none of here.
Damn, I think you made my day
https://apnews.com/article/france-retirement-age-strike-prot...
To wit:
> Of the approximately 50 million rental housing units in the United States, around 41% of the rental units are owned by mom and pop landlords, also known as individual investor landlords. That means approximately 20.5 million units are overseen by mom and pop landlords.
https://getflex.com/blog/landlord-statistics/
Also, from the same site, the average landlord has 3 properties. That means there are more than 6 million individual landlords in the US. I'm not going to nitpick whether that's "huge" or not; the point is proven.
Not to mention, you'd have to have a precise and well defined notion of what "analytical hobbies" are. Preferably one that doesn't carry an inherent classist[1] (and maybe even racist or sexist) bias. That part alone seems pretty tough, forget the actual definition part.
---
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-legged_essay
[1]: https://hbr.org/2016/12/research-how-subtle-class-cues-can-b...
> const input = '(add 2 (subtract 4 2))';
> const output = 'add(2, subtract(4, 2));';
Why not just say it came from North Korea? There's just about as much publicly available evidence for that as there is that it came from a lab leak in China.
None, as far as I know. Nor should it be particularly surprising that no animal origin for COVID-19 has yet been found. The animal origin for SARS was only discovered in 2017: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-07766-9 The first outbreak was in 2002. We're less than 4 years away from the first known outbreak of COVID-19, so dismissing a wild animal origin at this point is extremely premature at best.
Wow. Somehow, that seems shadier than just showing a misleading price then piling on fees for everyone.