332 karma · joined December 29, 2016
Why are you so set on blaming me for this? Do you want copies of restraining orders I had to file on the two people who came to my house?
When do you think someone should start being responsible for behaving dangerously?
I've been running a business with multiple locations for 10 years and I've never had a problem more serious than trolls on the internet doxxing me.
They've spammed business, social media accounts, email...
For some people the impact on their life is very real.
I can't use my name publicly on the internet because of trolls. This impacts my life in a huge way.
Graduates MIT in 3 years with the best possible GPA.
Internet commenter: "yeah but so what"
>Here’s an old riddle. If you haven’t heard it, give yourself time to answer before reading past this paragraph: a father and daughter are in a horrible car crash that kills the dad. The daughter is rushed to the hospital; just as she’s about to go under the knife, the surgeon says, “I can’t operate—that girl is my daughter!” Explain…
I'd also be curious to see what the results would be if it was a mother/daughter crash — I suspect that most people would say the father is the surgeon (rather than saying the girl has two moms), but I'd like to see at what rate.
My answer in the original question was two dads, but I'm not entirely sure if I misinterpreted "he's about to go under the knife" originally, or if I'm biased (I also might want to think I misinterpreted it because I don't want to be biased).
The article provides a lot of additional evidence of bias. I just found the first riddle interesting.
or themselves
>I would find some middle road where it is not a crime, but a civil order.
In the past this road has lead to people being committed because someone just didn't like them. Broadening committal to people deemed not acceptable by society is a dangerous path.
A lot of these popups specifically target based on various segments of Google keyword traffic. It's a good start.
They're losing a lot of points with customers with the "have 10 teams make 10 apps that do the same thing and slowly kill off support before discontinuing" model.
>solely for free google integration
Dude, you get what you pay for
For $29k you can get something that you can drive and is generally furnished better (in a lot of municipalities these tiny houses need to be on wheels to skirt code violations anyway).
It's a nice product from a UX/UI standpoint (so usability issues to solve still), and I look forward to trying it again next year.
...that's what this demo does
So it's not always a designer saying "I know better than you."
I do think that they're going about solving the problem the wrong way though. Your design should on its own encourage scrolling by making it obvious that additional content exists (avoiding so-called "false floors") — it can be harder to do this than unchanging your design and suggesting scrolljacking, which is why I think we see it so often.
Dude, where do you think their salaries come from?
>If advertising disappeared, there'd be a lot less crap on the internet.
Also Google wouldn't exist...