A more fair metric would be Co2 emissions/person and I’m getting
USA 14.3 t, China 8.8 t, EU 5.5 t, India 2.2 t
70 karma · joined July 4, 2012
A more fair metric would be Co2 emissions/person and I’m getting
USA 14.3 t, China 8.8 t, EU 5.5 t, India 2.2 t
We’re an early stage blockchain startup building the next generation of decentralized financial infrastructure. Our novel architecture provides more than 10x better performance than competitors while completely avoiding any centralised party (or leader) having an edge over other participants, eradicating MEV issues and enabling more fair markets.
Backed by a16z crypto and 1kx.
Hiring: Backend Engineer (with trading systems experience), Business Development Lead, Content & Growth Strategist
Apply here: https://pod.network/hiring
Which is not "...characterised by government giving handouts".
If you sell something for 150$ and it cost you 30$ your gross margin is (150-30)/150=80%.
But we don't do that, and that's why mathematics don't have to do with experience, they are an entirely different tool that also happens to be useful in experimental science.
But in any case. You obviously do not believe that mathematical objects exist in the first place and it the question is ill posed based on your concept of reality and existence.
That's understandable, but the debate is about which is the right definition of existence reality etc. If you are not interested in this discussion and know the answers then you have nothing to gain from this paper or this discussion.
Unicorns don't exist but statements about them aren't meaningless. Fictionalism accepts the concept of mathematical entities but denies their existence in the real world.
Where is the line between abstract objects and the real world you mentioned? Can you give a rule that separates the two?
Do black holes exist? Electrons? Magnetic fields? Is one of these a model but doesn't really exist?
The same problems will not be necessarily manifested if the law is applied in the US, especially if Canada has similar laws. However, the points of the first link seem to hold.
What happened to CSV?
Edit: Maybe you want to be able to save the equations etc?
This way, the entrepreneur has incentive to spend it or do more investments instead of keeping it in the bank where it would be taxed.
This incentive leads to inequality decreasing by the economy being more active.
_(array)
.compact()
.map(function(x) {
return x * x;
})
.filter(function(x) {
return x > 100;
}).value()
(example from underscore/lodash)The problem with this is to be able to add a custom function to this pipeline, you have to extend the prototype of the library with your own functions, or re-implement it.
Extending the prototype is considered bad practice for a lot of reasons, for example due to polluting code in other modules or upstream changes breaking your code.
If instead of chaining methods we chained functions we are left with this awkward syntax:
custom(filter(map(compact(array), function(x) {
return x * x;
}), function(x) {
return x > 100;
}));
it's much cleaner to write it like this: compact(arr)
|> map(function(x) {
return x * x;
})
|> filter(function(x) {
return x > 100;
})
|> custom
The linked page has a nice example and explanation about this concerning promises https://github.com/mindeavor/es-pipeline-operator#sample-usa...1) Due to being in the monetary union, Greece is not able to print more money, devalue its currency or other monetary policies to help its economy. Greece is paying the price of being in a monetary union, and it should either get help from the other members of that union, or it is not really a union.
2) Also, take into account that Germany and other countries are benefitting from this monetary union by being able to use a currency that is devalued due to the poorer countries, and therefore is able to increase its export.
3) Much of the bailout went into the banks of other eurozone members therefore helping them as well.
4) Do not forget that Greece if not in the eurozone would be able to default on its debts, live on the primary surplus it is now generating and when it is considered a good debtor to get loans again. Instead of having to exit the eurozone (which would be a bad sign for the whole union) and default on its debts (which would mean other countries losing money) and THEN grow, it may be beneficial to everyone to do a debt restructuring.
5) Greece is paying an interest on the loan given to them to be able to pay the older debts to the ECB and others. They are not able to pay that interest on the subsequent loans and are asking to be able to use that for economic growth to pay the older loans! In a sense, you can see that as debt restructuring, which can also happen in other ways. This way creditors will also get their money back, altough restructured or payed later.
What if the changes to the constants are random?