I'm the same person as above, btw. I have noprocrast on that account. It is working very well for me ;)
They have, however, authored a Cordova plugin for others to use the PayPal SDK easily from their PhoneGap apps [1]
12 karma · joined September 13, 2012
I'm the same person as above, btw. I have noprocrast on that account. It is working very well for me ;)
They have, however, authored a Cordova plugin for others to use the PayPal SDK easily from their PhoneGap apps [1]
Chrome's click-to-play is just such necessity.
1) The intent was to separate my personal and professional social presence: Facebook is no place for doing or talking business.
2) I was looking for work at the time.
3) I tend to try things out
> If you don't want to connect with your professional network, I never said that.
> if you don't care who looked at your profile Whether I care or not, I don't think the network should be reporting views to profile owners. I don't think I am alone in this either: Can you think of any other social network that does this? Would you go back to Facebook if it reported your every view to your contacts? Of course I'm spooked by this.
> What do you think is the purpose of having a LinkedIn account?
Not sure. I can eliminate a few things:
- Not finding employees. I'm supposed to pay for premium to be able to search properly and message people, and then (given my personal experience as a user) my message will be lost in the noise of irrelevant offers (who the hell thinks a PHP developer would be remotely interested/suitable for UI/UX, C++, Technical Writer, ... ? Mass mailers do). SO careers and behance has served me very well instead.
- Not finding work. Can I even separate my contacts into people-that-can-see-that-im-looking and people-that-shouldnt nowadays? If so, I'll call it progress. (My boss shouldn't know if I'm looking ffs)
- Not organizing contacts. One flat list of people?
- Not content. The majority of content I got to see was PR/HR kind of fluff that was almost exclusively cross-posted from elsewhere. None of my professional contacts actually generate content - that seems to happen on Twitter and G+.
I guess I use it as another online CV.
* 2012 hack. 6.5M unsalted SHA1 password hashes leaked [1]
* 2013 Acquires Pulse, forces existing users to create a LinkedIn account. Users are pissed [2]
* 2013 LinkedIn Intro. In case you missed it, it was an iOS app that changed your mail settings to proxy your incoming mail through linkedin's servers in order to inject a frame with business-card-like CTAs. In the meantime, this naturally gave them instant access to all your emails. Massive privacy implications.
* 2013 LinkedIn Intro, 3 days after release. Jordan Wright shows a CSS-based phishing attack: security implications as well [3]
My personal experience with LinkedIn:
* My profile info is available to premium users without my consent
* Premium users can spam me without my consent.
* "Who viewed your profile" feature. Unbelievable.
* Constant contact requests from random people. I can't turn their email notifications off entirely (introductions are mandatory). EDIT: I was mistaken - <sarcasm>the process is very straightforward [5]</sarcasm>
* They seem to be in the business of intentionally misleading people (2011) [4]
So, personally I'm the furthest you can get from being a fan and I can't imagine what you were a fan of. They're top ranking on my shit list.
[1] http://blog.linkedin.com/2012/06/06/linkedin-member-password...
[2] http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2306932/linkedin-in...
[3] http://jordan-wright.github.io/blog/2013/10/26/phishing-with...
[4] http://www.michielgaasterland.com/online-reputation/try-link...
[5] http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-disable-all-of-linkedi...
---- Spoilers, obviously ----
So they're clones, and they have a "special repeating marker" of some sorts. One of the clones is a biochemist, and she manages to decode it. Turns out, it is a copyright message covering those organisms and their biological offspring as property of X corporation. -------- Spooky, but wouldn't the message get diluted after reproduction?
I tried tweaking a few flags (such as much longer timeout: -w 30), still no luck.
$ traceroute -m 100 -e -w 30 obiwan.scrye.net
(...all normal here...)
8 core2-te0-0-0-4.faraday.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.249.45) 6.795 ms core1-te0-0-0-5.faraday.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.249.43) 11.500 ms core1-te0-0-0-4.faraday.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.249.41) 13.669 ms
9 host213-121-193-129.ukcore.bt.net (213.121.193.129) 5.964 ms 6.068 ms host213-121-193-137.ukcore.bt.net (213.121.193.137) 7.362 ms
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
(...and so on...)