91 karma · joined May 2, 2017
Since neither the user nor the programmer knows the right answer, we have to work iterations in. Each iteration is followed by feedback. Given how often we end up being completely wrong, it is best to get to the first feedback as quickly as possible.
Other animals live on this planet too. Is it fair for us to refuse to make even a small change but expect land and sea animals to deal with our plastic waste?
The landfill solution is another way of saying "put it somewhere I can't see." Would we like plastic storms around own our homes?
Hard problems always feel this way. <insert slavery reference>
1. No way to stop eating animals 2. No way to stop driving/flying 3. Don't ask me to change. YOU change.
=> no change in status quo
Changing our own diet is on the table too... considering we don't need to eat cattle to survive. This problem is one of overconsumption, and isn't going away by keeping our lifestyle the same.
It is not fair to allow some countries to make decisions based on economics but expect others to be ecologically responsible. Let's see how the US handles its own trash now, since China has stopped importing it.
People have tried to materialize this idea in multiple ways over time - HTC, microformats, web components etc. It should not be surprising that the solutions are similar. This isn't to say the first implementation was the best, and the others have just forgotten history. I am sure there are some pretty senior web developers around who remember their history, and were even part of it. If anything we should be optimistic that the new implementations have learned from the mistakes of the past.