44 karma · joined December 29, 2018
I know this is a low quality/value comment to the overall discussion, but I could not help myself!
Free version
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/science/ancient-viruses-d...
I see from the articles linked and their site that their business model is different, but I doubt they could sell enough service to cover the cost of launching and maintaining their own constellation. Their best hope (and plan) might be to get absorbed by one of the bigger players.
It is hard to compete against a well-funded company that makes its own rockets and payloads and has access to hundreds of experienced engineers in their own and sister companies.
I am not even that convinced that Lynk's idea would work from a technological point of view. A quick look at Wikipedia states that: "A low Earth orbit (LEO) is an Earth-centered orbit with an altitude of 2,000 km (1,200 mi) "
I don't think you're getting a cell-signal to remain above the noise threshold/detectable level that far, especially under unfavorable atmospheric conditions. Yes, the satellite could have some impressive high-gain antenna, but the average cell phone is not going to transmit enough power to go more than 50 miles, let alone over a 1000. I'd genuinely love to see some data that contradicts me as I find the concept intriguing.
https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/25/ubiquitilink-advance-means...
I don't buy that a cell phone has the power transmit to LEO even with clear skies and line of sight, but seems interesting.
I think we should welcome it.