1,516 karma · joined October 28, 2011
Hardly-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
> Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"),[1] short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
You failed at the "genuine discussion" part by citing pop econ horseshit.
The customers are paying for it, if only in future higher prices.
Wipe that polish off your face before speaking bootlicker.
The closest a math teacher can do is give the minimum necessary grade for the student to move on to the next class at the end of the year.
Are there many farmers markets open for the second shift worker getting off at, say, 10pm?
Fraud?
I find it clean, non-distracting, 'sterile'- I end up focusing more on the people around me than the buildings towering over me.
So, your connection to _qhtn.org may be secure, but it may not be this _qhtn you're exchanging data with. Traditional CAs claim to do some sort of ID verification.
EDIT: I am very wrong.
For a lot of other stuff check out Saylor.org's old 'major's page:
https://sayloracademy.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/20904185...
If you're the best or close to, you're allowed to make mistakes (See Linus' toxic remarks). God have mercy on you if you aren't.