105 karma · joined May 14, 2023
Somewhat missing the cutoff of 1875 is the revised NT of the KJV. Work on it started in 1870 but likely wasn't used widely before 1881.
I'll draw simple UI prototypes then rearrange and/or document. I can also easily share it with a colleague to comment or modify.
Here's one:
https://asciiflow.com/#/share/eJztXE1v2zYY%2FivvNAxwsDRBlrTA...)
I'm only the crypto weirdo guy asking.
...at least the mandatory automated checking processes are probably not far off at least for the more reputable journals, but it still makes you wonder how much you can trust the last two years of LLM-enhanced science that is now being quoted in current publications and if those hallucinations can be "reverted" after having been re-quoted. A bit like Wikipedia can be abused to establish facts.
Now let me also say that preparing the curriculum, ordering the materials etc. takes a lot of effort and discipline. It's definitely almost a full time job and I'm blessed with an amazing wife that's gifted in all that but the reward is more than worth it. Also, if you're thinking about it, many states have home school support programs and put you in touch with other home schoolers in the area.
As to Lenin: The mouse died because it didn't understand why the cheese was free
https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit?tab=readme-ov-file#...
So with a newer non-LTS ubuntu you can just apt install lazygit, with 24.04 it's
``` LAZYGIT_VERSION=$(curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/jesseduffield/lazygit/releases/..." | \grep -Po '"tag_name": "v\K[^"]') curl -Lo lazygit.tar.gz "https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/releases/download/v..." tar xf lazygit.tar.gz lazygit sudo install lazygit -D -t /usr/local/bin/ ```
Please don't start a flame on this. If you can't stand trump, make it an exercise in self-control and skip the reply on this one.
TL;DR: It works surprisingly well even while in motion - if the price tag doesn't put you off.
Beliefs become religion when you have that choice to make and then you should absolutely not publish against your better judgment for any sum of money but work on your belief system. What I'm saying is that it still is not a requirement to science to challenge your beliefs because when you miss or omit that part your experiments and observations are still of scientific nature ergo challenging your beliefs is not a requirement to science [my original claim]. You're free to challenge them down the line with your own experiments and observations for me, giving me a chance to reevaluate my beliefs.
You question mine, and I'll question yours completes the cycle but if you don't let me question yours because you already did that, where's the science in that?
Anyone that I know that drinks raw milk, raw uncured meats, untreated water hasn't seen a doctor in over a decade.. not terribly scientific but a good indicator that I won't buy pharma-money backed "scientific" studies that show that low-fat, low-sodium and oats-in-cereal-bars are the solution to health issues. I'm all for science and capitalism but they're both not substitutes for common sense.
The article (no surprise from AP) goes a long way to make sure the negativity vocabulary soup is complete against all conservative voices that advocate self-determination.
Please don't take away my freedom by dictating my health choices, esp. when you live in a concrete jungle and eat fast food at least five days a week.
Also many websites are making it remarkably hard to not use the app if they even remotely sense you're not on an actual PC. FB and LinkedIn aren't banks but prime examples.