__alexs

Most people who talk about AI consciousness don't even know what monism or dualism mean.

Manager's do not build anything despite what the management-class might want you to believe.

Do the labs have a genuine interest in mathematics beyond generating interesting marketing material?

Negligence is also a well understood legal concept.

This was literally the first coding job I ever got paid to do.

I would decompile the Google browser extension to extract the hash algorithm they used to sign page rank lookup requests, rewrite it in PHP and ship it to SEOs on weird forums.

They updated the hash every few months and I made enough money to pay for some summer activities as a teen.

System 1 isn't even a correct theory in the context of human reasoning, it's just pop-sci nonsense.

If you are reading this sort of post and feeling inclined to share your own opinion, please take a moment to go and read about monism vs dualism before you start.

Sounds wildly overcomplicated.

In my testing Jev is not what I would call "usually correct" on most topics that involve knowledge of the world outside of the context you give it.

There is no evidence Aardvarks in egypt at that time. I think we'd probably expect at least a few aardvark bones if it was.

If this is not a dog then we should cast doubt over the identity of the other animals we think we know too.

How are people using custom harnesses cost effectively? Do they avoid Anthropic models so they can use OpenAI subscription pricing and open weights stuff?

PCI-E is really very flexible https://developer.nvidia.com/gpudirect

You probably want to stand in front of it in this case.

You want supply to exceed demand? That doesn't seem very sustainable.

I don't think these results show that.

I think they show that additional prompting for testing approaches have wide differences in error rate (worst has twice the error rate of the best) but actually no extra prompting is pretty fine and most custom prompts are worse than no prompt.

Regulation might have something to do with it but your example doesn't show that imo.

Multiple US labs were taken to court over copyright infringment for their training data. Mistral did the same data mining, but actually the copyright situation is weaker here so it's harder to build a case against them.

I think the capital situation in EU is just worse. A lot of is tied up in more conservative businesses that are reluctant to bet the house on some shiny new thing.

That's because NOAA are not doing the tests that would produce such evidence.

The brief excitement in the space between expecting a decahedral possibly artificial structure lurking in a gas giant and finding out it's just wind.

This has mid 2000's LiteStep theme vibes.

Windows CE (1996) was garbage compared to Palm OS (also 1996.)

I don't want that but it seems like it would the door to that kind of outcome.

Why move gun, when gun can move bullet?

Echoes of the Darian Scheme somehow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darien_scheme

This line of thinking is quite confusing to me. If you keep following it then ultimately we must reckon with the reality that we only experience time in one direction. While it might be technically true that "there is only so much you can do with that" I think it might also be a completely useless statement to make.

Anyone doing high volume on Stripe is paying IC+ rates. These numbers aren't comparable as you grow.

For me the problem is not that it has a plugin based architecture. It's that it ONLY has that. If there are no batteries included what's the point?

Yes this whole focus on customisation and plugins etc is really just laziness and the absence of innovation. I don't want an infinitely programmable IDE. I already have that it's called my computer.

I want something that actually has an opinion and gives me productive value without having to spend days reconfiguring it first.

This video really deserves a better soundtrack.

Biology is in some sense a language, how do we even agree on what the boundaries of biology vs other domains of science are without participants agreeing on the rules?

In any case I think you have an overly narrow definition of learning that we're unlikely to come to terms over.