> speculation needs a cause
it definitely doesn't, as people buy shit all the time on impulse alone. when you have zillions of dollars, that impulse buying can look different, as you kind of say as well.
596 karma · joined October 19, 2024
it definitely doesn't, as people buy shit all the time on impulse alone. when you have zillions of dollars, that impulse buying can look different, as you kind of say as well.
it doesn't seem necessary to read a full CoT exchange. rather a final graph of why a decision was made would be ideal for my usage.
Or: "All companies are essentially gigantic conglomerates eating each others' food by selling my own and others' data to each other, so I basically have rights to their claimed assets anyway."
Or: "No company or government respects my privacy or property rights, so why should I respect theirs?"
Some of that is a form of "I am going to steal, because others are stealing", and well, if stealing becomes the norm, yeah, I would say the comment has some validity in a few words for the common citizen.
Also they say they are open sourcing the reference implementation of the "JetKVM OS Services" and the firmware of the "JetKVM Mini".
My point is more that it is way easier to make mistakes in source than it is to review said source in a project like this. So, to me, it is kind of risky to use something very green that is meant to be used as a network appliance more or less.
Because the training data is millions of hours human efforts being distilled into a cascading hierarchy of enrichment by interested parties without providing attribution or compensation?
IMO, it is extremely naive to trust these black box remote service API calls, especially at an institution that can provide $$$ for local compute.
This whole fiasco reminds one of this story: https://www.theregister.com/offbeat/2010/05/14/facebook-foun...
to my knowledge, no one has released a classic UO (t2a, etc) web client, though it would be pretty easy to do these days
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_massively_multiplay...
i think the author would find ultima online emulators interesting
Also, what guarantee is there that whomever created that document didn't just date it two days prior to acquire more funding for doing spooky things?
document.querySelectorAll("p").forEach(p => p.textContent = p.textContent.replace(/(^\w)|([.?!]\s*\w)|( i'? )/g, m => m.toUpperCase()));A reminder that we can all be forced to quit when pressured.
Not immune, maybe, but pretty well off if they didn't buy in.
https://llmxllm.com/is-my-genital-system-better-than-5-other...
It has the same purpose as musk's twitter buyout, to confuse the space of objective reality, and he isn't alone in his purpose.
Epistemic dialog be damned, if it is just based on volume of text referenced.
Imagine if Musk backlinks every existing twitter thread to "grokipedia" the way that first words are done with wikipedia.
It will be a claim of "oh, its just part of the platform"
Then meta and every other evil asshole that wants to control reality will follow, until we put their heads under a guillotine.