There just as much completely unrelated to the incident in that as there is related.
Also, what guarantee is there that whomever created that document didn't just date it two days prior to acquire more funding for doing spooky things?
Also, what guarantee is there that whomever created that document didn't just date it two days prior to acquire more funding for doing spooky things?
That's how evidence works for extraordinary claims. Alas, scientific rigor is a harsh master.
There's a reason RV is considered pseudoscience.
It speaks volumes you don't see any problem with the lack of proof that the documents weren't backdated, and get defensive when people tell you this must absolutely be ruled out if we're ever to even start considering your alleged evidence.