Now, steelman argument is that DMARC is used together with SMTP, so it should be somewhat compatible to work in practice. But in this case there isn't fundamental conflict breaking SMTP.
230 karma · joined November 26, 2017
Now, steelman argument is that DMARC is used together with SMTP, so it should be somewhat compatible to work in practice. But in this case there isn't fundamental conflict breaking SMTP.
That includes representing department in stupid meetings, instead of wasting developers/engineers time.
Rspamd and spamassassin have missing MID check in their default rules, I am sure that most antispam software is same.
If you add additional piece to chain, chain becomes weaker, not stronger
> get AI-DoSed
Thats not that common. There are specific industries prone to DDoS, like gaming, but your average site don't get DDoS-ed. Then again CF free service really don't protect your site from DDoS. I have seen several times CF becoming source of DoS (not caching or denying malicious requests) and if back-end is on shared infra, CF goes to firewall.
> will have an expired cert.
Your back-end still needs certificate
I don't know, what they meant with blessing, but Intel server motherboards had PCI-X slots and this was common bus for servers/workstations. Mostly used by SCSI and RAID controllers, high-end network adapters.
Address: 1800 Bishops Gate Blvd
Isn't gate common way to suffix scandals in USA?
Some free servers are still around, but don't offer public accounts. Few places give account, if you ask. Eternal September is strongest-biggest still running and free service. Mixmin allows anonymous posting, but sometimes restricts it to fight with abuse. Google still relays groups to Usenet, though they have their own thing going and some servers are blocking posts from google.
Now, those mailbox.org and others use (probably) commercial version. which comes with additional functionality (like document converters for preview) and providers make their own customizations top of that anyway.
Additionally, I think that your definition of "digital currencies" is little bit strict. IRS isn't going to look definitions, that exclude taxable income. User semiquaver already posted snippet from "Bloomberg Tax", showing potential interest for gaming currencies.