Move back in with your parents? Rent a room from a live-in-landlord because you can't afford your own place? Congrats, you are a "home owner" according to that number!
2,895 karma · joined August 24, 2011
Move back in with your parents? Rent a room from a live-in-landlord because you can't afford your own place? Congrats, you are a "home owner" according to that number!
Heck it's not even weird to not bother with this redefinition and just have a party on a more convenient day.
Policy changes allowing substantially more construction finally bearing fruit?
We have a long way to go but there has been some significant movement in that direction, particularly in the most expensive housing markets.
While searching for it I found the comic appeared as homework in a marketing class, with this wonderful student asking for help explaining the underlying marketing techniques:
https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/2-...
I think the theory is that "stale" water lacks sufficient oxygen for tea brewing to fully brew or something.
The site asked for forgiveness and assured me that it was "under construction". But it was already perfect.
0-147k: 12.4%
147k+: 0%
The number goes down at the higher income bracket, which means you pay less % of your money in payroll taxes the more you make. That is the very definition of regressive.
Telling them to follow the sun will be about as successful as telling an actual owl that it's sleeping at the winyg time and needs to hunt during the day like the rest of the birds.
But if I buy game Y, and play it, steam will then prevent you from playing my game X at the same time.
If old homes were somehow better and more desirable, they could theoretically be both. But homes aren't like comic books or magic cards: newer-built ones are generally better in quality, often dramatically so.
Post Musk, Twitter's debt was already going for 70 cents on the dollar, and that's before the news of this week
Having worked as SRE on efficiency projects for BigCo, it is not at all uncommon to recover more than your lifetime salary in company savings with only a few months work or even less. The scale of things is so immense that even a slightly better handling of things can lead to outsize returns.
Laying off someone like that, rather than putting them on full-time efficiency work, is an obvious waste.
Total production, notably, is still increasing.
Doing everything "right" is not going to make a 5am natural sleeper into a morning person, it's going to make them into a 3am natural sleeper.
There are almost surely a whole host of bugs just outputting in the format the user has, never mind mixing issues, copyright protection, and similar.