42 karma · joined October 25, 2023
I had to run someone's 10 year old R workflow last week. Ran perfectly.
Last years python code will not run unless someone was careful enough to make a requirements.txt. Try explaining that to the non computer scientists. My python support colleague runs into that constantly. She is not a happy support person.
> I'll be happy when we have a successor language for R, but it won't be 2024 Python.
When it comes to statistics, and especially having to program stats analysis instead of just calling libraries, R is a much better language than Python or Julia. When it comes to other things, they are better than R. I use all 3 daily.
And as someone who uses both languages daily, Python is much better at some things, R in others. R is much better in coding stats analysis.
Competition is great, may both thrive.
and if you ask why, 2 packages: psfrag and pstricks.
yes and no, that bit me last week, some packages decided to become incompatible. but in my case 99% of old files compile fine today.
For me, they need to promise full backwards compatibility.
Sadly its more than that. Will we be able to compile a typst file made today in 10 years? I have to do that regularly with latex. Will everybody one collaborates with also use typst? Very unlikely. A new PhD student may find it beneficial to write papers with someone who only uses latex. then why bother with typst? (and I really want typst to win)
The Last Emperor of Mexico, Edward Shawcross
Super-Infinite, Katherine Rundell
Stasiland, Anna Funder