440 karma · joined May 22, 2008
Because I agree.
You make this sound way easier than I would expect it to be in the general case.
Isn't this a time claim?
Here's the quote about the street names:
> Second, I am struck by the design of the interface itself: the sci-fi overlay of street names, borders, parcel numbers, target distances, and so on.
Struck. Doesn't sound like a value judgement to me. The only thing the author has an explicit problem with is the level of detail the camera captures. I see two sentences in reference to this. I wonder why you thought the first sentence was necessary (I'll leave the arguments that don't actually address anything in the article alone).
Can you clarify what kind of penalty it had then?