Well yeah, more code means more bad code. I'm interested to know whether more code means proportionally more bad code. If not, his statement doesn't mean much.
96 karma · joined April 15, 2018
Well yeah, more code means more bad code. I'm interested to know whether more code means proportionally more bad code. If not, his statement doesn't mean much.
(technically: I never heard anyone say they could not do this until now, but I have heard people say they CAN do this (including me). So as far as I knew all my N sample size of humans was positive for this, or at least not negative, previously indicating to me that the ability is "integral" to being human.)
All along, I've assumed this "mind's eye" ability was integral to being a human being.
How to reconcile these two ideas?
It didn't seem like he was saying "yeah I guess I do have a really rare perspective", it seemed like he was literally saying "I'm the only one." Maybe he's even the best person in the world to ask, if you could only ask one person. But the only one? Maybe his comment was playful/less literal, but it didn't come off that way to me.
I enjoyed most of this article, but wow, what an arrogant response.
Well said. Looks like no one else is expressing this; I completely agree.
Welp, I'm over 22, guess I'm never starting a company.
I think maybe "high-performing employee", in this system, is simply defined at least in part as "one who prepares excellent presentations for promotion committees."
Vague/changing reqs is of course a separate problem.
Not sure if that's correct, but sounds plausible.
But oh man, when you actually do write that one function that does the cool thing in a neat way and fits into the other crap you're wading around in without breaking anything in a way that makes intuitive sense... man, does that feel nice.
Edit: On the other hand, asking the question in a way that gets at the concept, not the term, seems very reasonable.
I don't think it's relevant, but yes, I have interviewed at such companies.
I call BS if they "take points off" for not knowing the exact term "joint table", and if so that's not the kind of company I'd want to work for.