398 karma · joined May 8, 2011
> Starting in 2027*, a silent update, nonconsensually pushed by Google, will block every Android app whose developer hasn't registered with Google, signed their contract, paid up, and handed over government ID.
Frontier AI software development still falls short in the design/architecture department, in my recent experience. Though it's pretty impressive at making "working" code.
This being a fairly direct conversion from one language to another, even keeping the same interfaces across files, means the architecture is already in place.
The detailed test coverage is also very helpful for Claude. But even detailed testing can't cover every edge case.
So my questions are: How well did Claude do on the edge cases? And how maintainable will this codebase be going forward?
Also decoding on a reasonably powerful (non-accelerated) cpu is fast enough for 1080p, not ideal for battery life but still.
Google One Tap works via a script tag from Google servers: https://developers.google.com/identity/gsi/web/guides/displa...
After realizing there was no demo I was looking for a way to contact you directly with a few sample images, but can't find contact information on the website.
Consider adding a demo and contact info.
Otherwise, the app is looking solid. This seems like a great use of AI.
Either way, it's pretty wild.
https://commonslibrary.org/authoritarianism-how-you-know-it-...
What are the Top 10 Elements of the Authoritarian Playbook?
1. Divide and rule: Foment mistrust and fear in the population.
2. Spread lies and conspiracies: Undermine the public’s belief in truth.
3. Destroy checks and balances: Quietly use legal or pseudo-legal rationales to gut institutions, weaken opposition, and/or declare national emergencies to seize unconstitutional powers.
4. Demonize opponents and independent media: Undermine the public’s trust in those actors and institutions that hold the state accountable.
5. Undermine civil and political rights for the unaligned: Actively suppress free speech, the right to assembly and protest and the rights of women and minority groups.
6. Blame minorities, immigrants, and “outsiders” for a country’s problems: Exploit national humiliation while promising to restore national glory.
7. Reward loyalists and punish defectors: Make in-group members fearful to voice dissension.
8. Encourage or condone violence to advance political goals: Dehumanize opposition and/or out-groups to justify violence against them.
9. Organize mass rallies to keep supporters mobilized against made-up threats: Use fearmongering and hate speech to consolidate in-group identity and solidarity.
10. Make people feel like they are powerless to change things: Solutions will only come from the top.
Making Humans a Multiplanetary Species (2016) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7Uyfqi_TE8
Elon Musk talks Climate Change and Carbon Tax at the Sorbone 2015 https://youtu.be/sUFwwlmxRsw?t=978
It could be that he was just following the trends knowing there was money to be made, but I detect some real passion back in these videos.
Of course no motivation comes from a single source and there's some mix of philanthropy and money driving this, among other motivations.
Either way his tone has changed a lot, to say the least.
Elon used to be all about truly advancing society, now he only seems interested in gaining wealth and power.
"Sabatoge" and repair is discussed at 11:45
o1 did a significantly better job converting a JavaScript file to TypeScript than Llama 3.1 405B, GitHub Copilot, and Claude 3.5. It even simplified my code a bit while retaining the same functionality. Very impressive.
It was able to refactor a ~160 line file but I'm getting an infinite "thinking bubble" on a ~420 line file. Maybe something's timing out with the longer o1 response times?
https://cloud.google.com/vision/docs/handwriting
I threw together a basic UI with the transcribed text in an editable area next to the image where I would edit any adjustments as it wasn't 100% perfect.
Similar/inspired-by software is fine but if a commercial project were to rip off everything down to the style and design of an existing app it would not be okay at all, what makes it okay if it's open source?
You seem very convinced that the NYT pulled this notion from thin air and Bush was experiencing a moment of wonder towards everyday technology (the theme of this thread).
After reading the article, I believe this is the first electric scanner Bush saw. Bush is quoted saying "This is for checking out?" "I just took a tour through the exhibits here," "Amazed by some of the technology."
"Some grocery stores began using electornic scanners as early as 1976, and the devices have been in general use in American supermarkets for a decade."
This tells me that he hadn't been to a grocery store with this technology, which seems very plausible for many politicians, then and now. They have people to do that for them, they're out of touch (at least to some degree).
This is a problem with all UI libraries. React at least makes it difficult to write components with side effects.
I keep it at ~80% limit normally with occasional charges to 100% for long trips, etc. I do spend a lot of time on battery though so it's charging and draining a lot, but rarely goes above 80% charge.
Thanks for posting your results, I'm curious just how much the charge limit helps battery longevity.
I've been using it successfully for around a year. It works pretty well sans a couple quirks due to hardware limitations e.g. if you plug in with the screen closed (sleep mode) it will charge fully to 100%.
Imagine the potential bandwidth savings. I bet this has applications as a modern "Dial-up accelerator" for people with slow connections and fast hardware.