216 karma · joined November 27, 2019
It's a challenging decision to make and I also believe in most cases it isn't a decision that is "free" or without some form of consequences. All things come at a cost.
I pay the people who house sit and watch my pets, I still consider it a favor in addition to paying them.
Here is part of the claims section, starting around "pgs 47/48", and all of it looks like this.
"A two-way communication system for detecting an ana lyte in a bodily fluid from a subject, comprising:
a) a reader assembly comprising a programmable proces Sor that is operably linked to a communication assem bly:
b) an external device configured to transmit a protocol to the communication assembly; detection assembly for detecting said signal which is transmitted via said communication assembly to said external device.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the reader assembly further comprises a controller having computer-executable commands for performing the reaction at a designated point of-care location.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the external device fur ther comprises a means for receiving and aggregating a plu 45
c) a test device configured to be inserted into the reader assembly, said test device comprising:
i) a sample collection unit configured for collecting a sample of bodily fluid Suspected to contain an analyte;
ii) an assay assembly containing reactants that react with said sample of bodily fluid based on the protocol transmitted from said external device to yield a detect able signal indicative of the presence and/or concen tration of said analyte; and iii) an identifier that is configured to provide the identity of said test device and is also configured to trigger the transmission of said protocol that is selected"
So yeah, super generic.
The current numbers are the ones that don't add up. Even John Hopkins estimates up to 500k cases in the US at the moment.
Though arguably if a company went ahead and leaped into action and saved millions of lives, when the patent holder didn't lift a finger. There is some debate on whether or not that should be punished and how that should be handled.
Patent #8,283,155 "Specifically, the present invention provides portable medical devices that allow real-time detection of analytes from a biological fluid."
and is described as by the article
"This patent describes a generic architecture for a machine that automates testing for the presence of substances in bodily fluids. In the system described by the patent, an operator inserts a "test device" (which contains both the bodily fluid to be tested and the reactants required to perform the test) into a "reader device." The reader device then triggers the necessary chemical reactions to perform the test and reports the results. Theranos' patent isn't limited to any specific bodily fluid, reactants, or testing protocol."
I'm all for reduced taxes though in some regards. So we agree in some areas and not others.
I'm preparing to leave and already have an interview with another company.
I'd much rather have tax cuts to reduce money lost through the middle man, as the middle man always wants a cut. Meaning you'd lose far more money to the process than if you were to just reduce taxes.
Now I understand the logic behind there being shortages. But saying that the general populous shouldn't wear masks because it doesn't do anything doesn't sound accurate.
OP's just arguing that in times of strife, we could potentially suffer because of a lack of self-reliance. He has a valid point, and should another even worse and longer lasting zoonotic(or any kind) disease spur up again, do you honestly think it's a good idea to make no steps towards developing emergency self-reliance systems in case of catastrophe? What about in times of war even, or other conflicts from upstream suppliers?
You're kinda putting words in OP's mouth and coming off as somewhat naive.
EDIT: Wow you really changed the tone and content of your comment. I'm glad you recognized the flaws in what you were saying and adjusted it, but I'm also semi concerned your original comment is your actual opinion on the matter.
I could double the cores and mem probably too.