I wonder if more fine-grained permissions would make more sense for this sort of feature. Perhaps it would be better if Android had support for "This app may read text messages from 1-800-XXX-XXXX" or something similar instead.
236 karma · joined May 10, 2011
I wonder if more fine-grained permissions would make more sense for this sort of feature. Perhaps it would be better if Android had support for "This app may read text messages from 1-800-XXX-XXXX" or something similar instead.
Snapchat has never given that particular illusion of privacy. As the most common and basic example, it has absolutely no way of stopping people from simply taking a screenshot of your image. Snapchat is meant to be used to share throwaway photos without the social expectation that comes from putting it on somewhere like Facebook. Anyone who uses the application learns quickly that someone can potentially store the photo they sent -- in a vast variety of ways.
This looks like a great step in the right direction.
An SSD is limited by its number of writes. To compensate for this, the SSD has very complicated on board logic that abstracts the actual SSD away from what it tells the OS system. This allows it to do certain tricks to save writes. However, when you are "scrubbing" an SSD, internally the SSD might be writing somewhere else entirely. Scrubbing is not considered an effective way of wiping SSDs, from what I believe.
Of course, anyone can code their own browser to lie about headers. It doesn't make much sense to specifically open yourself to vulnerabilities though.
Also note that this attack, JSON Hijacking, is different than a CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery) and has little to do with CSRF tokens.
It's unfortunate, because I find that often volunteer teenagers are the ones that truly have a passion for doing what they are doing, but they get held up by corporations or by people who want to monetize. When that doesn't work, the people in charge ignore the community until it dies.
It's sad to see it happen to another community.
I completely agree with a support system for people who need it, but I do NOT think that system should be based on racial background.
My grandparents were not even in this country at the time, it was not my ancestors nor me that hurt anyone. So I should have less because of what someone with the same skin colour as me did decades ago? Doesn't that seem a little, I don't know, discriminatory?
I have to pay $20,000 for my schooling. My first nations friends pay nothing, it's covered by tax payers. This includes numerous other benefits that I do not get. In Canada, unfortunately it can often seem like the minority have more privileges. That's not equality, to me.
It's bad practice to not use a secure login, because anyone who is sniffing HTTP traffic can see your Uptime Robot username and password in plaintext.
This might not be that bad for this website, but keep in mind how many people use the same email/password for other services, or their email.
I believe the majority of people would rather "own" their data because the idea of a company owning it makes them uncomfortable, however they don't care enough to learn to run their own and they aren't aware that alternatives are even possible.
To me, the key to a decentralized web is ease of use.
Unfortunately, when you become stressed exercise is often one of the first things to be neglected. Over the last few years I've learned that having a routine and sticking to it, no matter the circumstances, will do incredible things for your mood and energy.
Anonymous itself does not have leadership, it's more of a swarm mentality.
Because it's the home row, it also feels more natural when you are getting ready to type. The mental separation between "gaming" and "typing" is not hard to get a hold of really quick. Give it a try! I guarantee you'll be completely used to it within a week.
Also, keep in mind all of these keys can be remapped in Vim anyways :)