HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

Smith42

324 karma · joined May 1, 2019

submissionscomments
Smith42··on U.S. Department of Energy Launches the Genesis Open Models Initiative
What would the selected participants get from this? Looks like there is no offer of funding?
Smith42··on 80TB+ of astronomy for the HDD-poor: crossmatch the Universe from your laptop
The Multimodal Universe (MMU) pools together 80TB+ of data from over 30 astronomical surveys into one place. Crossmatching (linking observations of the same object across surveys) is its killer feature, but until now it required downloading hefty chunks of data to local disk. We got tired of needing a cluster just to run a crossmatch, so we gathered in the UniverseTBD and Hugging Science Discord servers to fix that. We've converted the MMU to the parquet-based HATS format so that you can use the LSDB and Hugging Face ecosystems to crossmatch from a laptop. The datasets are here https://huggingface.co/collections/UniverseTBD/multimodal-un.... No bulk downloads are necessary, and 4GB of RAM is enough even at Gaia scale.
Smith42··on US Government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5
It's always been this way ever since the first industrial revolution.
Smith42··on AI and the Ship of Theseus
So write it! Shouldn't be much extra to add to the AGPL licence?
Smith42··on Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data
We investigate the potential constraints on LLM scaling posed by the availability of public human-generated text data. We forecast the growing demand for training data based on current trends and estimate the total stock of public human text data. Our findings indicate that if current LLM development trends continue, models will be trained on datasets roughly equal in size to the available stock of public human text data between 2026 and 2032, or slightly earlier if models are overtrained. We explore how progress in language modeling can continue when human-generated text datasets cannot be scaled any further. We argue that synthetic data generation, transfer learning from data-rich domains, and data efficiency improvements might support further progress.
Smith42··on Astronomy Generates Mountains of Data. That's Perfect for AI – Universe Today
That really isn't the case, and I am not sure how you could arrive at that unsubstantiated conclusion.
Smith42··on AstroPT: Scaling Large Observation Models for Astronomy
Abstract:

This work presents AstroPT, an autoregressive pretrained transformer developed with astronomical use-cases in mind. The AstroPT models presented here have been pretrained on 8.6 million 512 × 512 pixel grz-band galaxy postage stamp observations from the DESI Legacy Survey DR8. We train a selection of foundation models of increasing size from 1 million to 2.1 billion parameters, and find that AstroPT follows a similar saturating log-log scaling law to textual models. We also find that the models' performances on downstream tasks as measured by linear probing improves with model size up to the model parameter saturation point. We believe that collaborative community development paves the best route towards realising an open source `Large Observation Model' -- a model trained on data taken from the observational sciences at the scale seen in natural language processing. To this end, we release the source code, weights, and dataset for AstroPT under the MIT license, and invite potential collaborators to join us in collectively building and researching these models.

Smith42··on Building a deep learning rig
$15k!
Smith42··on AnyGPT: Unified Multimodal LLM with Discrete Sequence Modeling
"Large Observation Model" has a nice ring to it
Smith42··on A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting
If you are interested in this also check out EarthPT, which is also a time series decoding transformer (and has the code and weights released under the MIT licence): https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07207
Smith42··on Sxmo: Linux tiling window manager for phones
What's new with SXMO? Haven't been keeping up since 2021. Is there a stable phone to run this on now?
Smith42··on EarthPT: A time series transformer foundation model
Wanted to share the code release of EarthPT, a model that predicts future satellite observations in a zero shot setting! I'm the first author so please shoot any questions you have at me.

EarthPT is a 700 million parameter decoding transformer foundation model trained in an autoregressive self-supervised manner and developed specifically with EO use-cases in mind. EarthPT can accurately predict future satellite observations across the 400-2300 nm range well into the future (we found six months!).

The embeddings learnt by EarthPT hold semantically meaningful information and could be exploited for downstream tasks such as highly granular, dynamic land use classification.

The coolest takeaway for me is that EO data provides us with -- in theory -- quadrillions of training tokens. Therefore, if we assume that EarthPT follows neural scaling laws akin to those derived for Large Language Models (LLMs), there is currently no data-imposed limit to scaling EarthPT and other similar ‘Large Observation Models.’(!)

Code: https://github.com/aspiaspace/EarthPT

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07207

Smith42··on OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster
Wishful thinkin buddy
Smith42··on OpenAI Just Killed an Entire Market in 45 Minutes
Anyone have a paste of the article? There is a paywall
Smith42··on Phind Model beats GPT-4 at coding, with GPT-3.5 speed and 16k context
Check out EarthPT! https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07207
Smith42··on TimeGPT-1
This isn't the first foundation model for time series, see EarthPT from last month: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07207
Smith42··on Chinchilla’s death
Yep we are running out of text data, see https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221454
Smith42··on A History of Neural Networks
Please give it a read! It begins from first principles (Rosenblatts perceptron!) and builds from there so you might find it more general than you expect.
Smith42··on A History of Neural Networks
I wanted it to reach a more general audience, as the review is very general in itself (but maybe the original title does not reflect this as I thought)! There are alternating sections concentrating on the astronomy and the deep learning sides.
Smith42··on Astronomia ex machina: a history, primer and outlook on neural nets in astronomy
Author here! We explore the past, present, and future of deep learning in astronomy. We predict that GPT-like foundation models will make a huge impact on the field, and that astronomy is ideally placed to supercharge open source large language modelling (Section 9).

My favourite excerpt, where we propose foundation model-powered scientists:

Autonomous agents are no longer science fiction; task-driven autonomous agents powered by the simulacra of a foundation model are capable of solving very general tasks when given only a high-level prompt by a human operator [305,306]. One could therefore imagine a semi-automated research pipeline, where an autonomous agent with astronomical knowledge is given access to a set of astronomical data through an API. The agent would be prompted with a high-level research goal (such as ‘find something interesting and surprising within this dataset’), and would then take steps to achieve this task. These steps could include querying research papers for a literature review, searching a large multi-modal astronomical dataset to find data that supports a theory, evoking and discussing its findings with additional simulacra, or spinning up simulations to test a hypothesis [307]. While the agent operates in the background, the human researcher would be able to provide high-level interpretation of the results, and would be a steady hand providing guidance and refinement of a more general research direction. In this way, an astronomical foundation model would provide the tools to make all astronomers the principal investigator of their own powerful ‘AI lab’

Smith42··on Ask HN: Those learning about neural networks, what do you find most difficult?
I wrote a literature review on applying neural networks to astronomical problems -- I found that using applications really helped to iron out what is going on in the networks! Here's the link to the review https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03796
Smith42··on Fork of Facebook’s LLaMa model to run on CPU
Since this is pytorch it should run on cpu anyway. What am I missing?
Smith42··on Research: The Transformative Power of Sabbaticals
Can I ask how old are you? I like your way of thinking
Smith42··on Astronomia ex machina: a history, primer and outlook on neural nets in astronomy
In recent years, deep learning has infiltrated every field it has touched, reducing the need for specialist knowledge and automating the process of knowledge discovery from data. This review argues that astronomy is no different, and that we are currently in the midst of a deep learning revolution that is transforming the way we do astronomy. We trace the history of astronomical connectionism from the early days of multilayer perceptrons, through the second wave of convolutional and recurrent neural networks, to the current third wave of self-supervised and unsupervised deep learning. We then predict that we will soon enter a fourth wave of astronomical connectionism, in which finetuned versions of an all-encompassing 'foundation' model will replace expertly crafted deep learning models. We argue that such a model can only be brought about through a symbiotic relationship between astronomy and connectionism, whereby astronomy provides high quality multimodal data to train the foundation model, and in turn the foundation model is used to advance astronomical research.
Smith42··on New 10 Terapixel Image of the Night Sky Contains 1B Galaxies
You can also generate similar scale astronomical images with GANs!

I worked on a model that could do this last year:

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10286

7.6 gigapixel image: https://star.herts.ac.uk/~jgeach/gdf