I'm unclear on what he means by the backend. Is ClangCL essentially the same as using LLVM for Windows with the Microsoft linker, or is there a difference in code generation?
2,602 karma · joined November 15, 2013
I'm unclear on what he means by the backend. Is ClangCL essentially the same as using LLVM for Windows with the Microsoft linker, or is there a difference in code generation?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34478503
I have long wished for less linear stories in video games, where branching narrative (a la Choose Your Own Adventure) is one possible way to give the player agency. The problem is, true branches are expensive, because you end up writing a bunch of content the player never experiences.
I see a lot of potential, but it's going to take a different kind of craftsmanship, and likely many iterations, to realize something more than a novelty.
I started looking at Kaitai Struct not too long ago. I purposely started with a pretty simple format, but I think I'm not smart enough to figure out the input format. Also, I'm pretty sure I hate YAML.
I tried building Poke just last week, having resolved to try it since 1.0, but hit problems with the Boehm GC on my old Mac, and then what looks like Readline problems on my new Mac. I haven't given up, but I'm off to a slow start.
Hachoir, mentioned in another comment, looks promising, although the input looks suspiciously similar to a program I'd write myself.
If one of the obstacles to data entry is normalization, perhaps an updatable view if your database supports it.
If it still ships with 64-bit Raspbian it might be worth another try, but I would not be at all surprised if it's somehow tied to the Pi.
My initial impression is that if I were to use a system like this, I would want any type annotation that differs from the default inference to be visible. The only choice left, then, is when to display redundant annotations, which is where a lot of the disagreement around type inference is, even without this scheme.
I did find a forum in which a user stated: "[Novell's Legal Vice President] said that while Novell retains certain copyrights over UNIX, they also acknowledge and recognize the validity of certain legacy SCO/Caldera licenses regarding UNIX technologies."
The code in this repo does not show any license. The repo from which it's derived claims GPL 3.0, although the README notes: "The code in the original scans are (c) Micro Focus who own the rights to the Unix source code" (Micro Focus International having acquired Attachmate, which acquired Novell, which bought Unix System Laboratories from AT&T).
I now rip each of my CDs to a single FLAC and cue sheet (using XLD on Mac), on the theory that it's the most accurate way to archive a disc. However, I haven't found anything that offers the same accessibility to such a collection as iTunes did. I look through folders, and drag a few cue sheets at a time into Foobar 2000.
Any tips?
(declare-const blitzen Int)
(declare-const comet Int)
...
(assert
(and
; lower bound for readability (1 is front)
(> blitzen 0)
(> comet 0)
...
; upper bound for readability (9 is rear)
(< blitzen 10)
(< comet 10)
...
; clues from the puzzle
(> vixen rudolph)
...
(< dasher vixen)))I keep thinking I'll pull my C64 out of the attic, but the nostalgia is kind of fading for me at this point. That compact flash cartridge looks really cool, though. I would have loved something like that back in the day.
Perhaps Google is uniquely incompetent, but I would be very wary about assuming that an eSIM-only phone will work with a given provider.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/08/24/virginia...
The marriage is known as a quaternary marriage, and the cousins are known as quaternary twins.
I'm no expert, but I don't think this is quite right. For an applicant with a bachelor's degree, the cutoff date is February 2012 for India, and April 2018 for China:
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/v...
With an advanced degree, it's December 2014 for India and April 2019 for China.
Please correct me if my understanding is incorrect.
They rejected my application before I got too far with the demo, which would have taken me a lot more than six hours to finish. Although it might have been an interesting addition to my Github repo, it was kind of tailored to this one company.
I'm not disagreeing with the OP, because I probably wouldn't find an interview project nearly as fun. I wonder, though, whether anyone has been successful with a one-off, company-specific project like this, as opposed to a general portfolio of projects that you've made over the years.
If a test started failing, I could annotate it as an xfail with an open-ended version pattern. If I noticed that an xfail started passing, making it a upass (I think these were blue in our tests results), I put an upper bound on the xfail version pattern.
The nice thing about this was that I could always run the latest and greatest suite against any version, although it made it a little more complicated to run them as they existed when they were first run.
https://www.usenix.org/sites/default/files/conference/protec...
Whereas the README uses URLs as the realm string, the slides uses realm strings like "root-password" or "ssh-v2" to derive keys from a seed stored in a UEFI variable.
I think the idea is that you can administer all of your servers with one master password, while each server derives different passwords locally from its own seed. If a given seed is compromised, rederive the passwords from a new seed (or reprovision the server from scratch). If your master password is compromised ... well, try not to let that happen.
Note that the recommended operation for GoKey requires the use of a seed file. Instead of deriving passwords directly from the master password, it derives them from a file of random data that is decrypted by the master password.
While it's true that this seed file doesn't require the ongoing synchronization that a vault does, it's something that you need to have, and to manage with care.
I think I know the title of Gordon's next blog post: "Why YAGNI is the second most over-rated programming principle."
I wasn't even going to click the link, because I thought this was for the old online book. Because of your comment, I see that Learn TLA+ has been updated, and Hillel says of the Practical TLA+ book I bought a couple of weeks ago: "Don't bother."
I haven't gotten that far yet, but I have modeled the wolf, cabbage, and goat problem, and helped the poor waiter in xkcd 287. Eventually I hope to apply it to a distributed database and our crazy Jira deployment. I'm not sure which will be harder.