718 karma · joined April 9, 2018
Honestly, I’d still wait a bit myself in their position. Maybe this government really will go in a new direction, but if not then this kind of thing could very easily come back to bite you. Having said that, I respect and admire the dozens of people who overcame decades of fear to speak up.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Hifamb4LTgQooDBYj/worth-reme...
Edit: I think we have to see a difference between domesticated pigs, bred and raised for purpose, and their cured, seasoned, fat... and some fat hacked off a wild ibex. If you’ve ever had wild game you’ll know what I mean about gamey flavors. I can only imagine that some ice age ibex would be an acquired taste at best. Pig fat is also some of the most delicious, mild fat around, which is why it’s pigs used in that article.
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/07/is...
https://www.livescience.com/18171-contradicting-conspiracy-t...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5724570/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235449075_Dead_and_...
It’s a breakdown in how humans think and believe, it’s just that. It doesn’t dominate everyone’s thinking, but it dominates enough people to skew elections and online conversations.
Most companies don't do business in Europe.
As defined under GDPR? I’d love citations for that claim.
No resistance to censorship.
No resistance to conflicting information.
More money = more “truth” with no recourse, because removing info costs.
Incorrect info loses you money, but there is no functional systemic way to determine correct/incorrect.
Waaaaay too much marketing and nothing else extant.
As a species we’re piss poor at calculating blowback in complicated systems, ranging from the deaths of animal species, to interventions in foreign lands. Is it really surprising? We have an incomplete picture of the systems we intervene in, so the outcomes surprise us, then we rationalize our next blunder with the old saw, “this time it will be different.”
That sounds like a better argument for China breaking up than it does using force and dystopian surveillance to maintain a lock on power.
Plus yes, nutters, obligate contrarians, and conspiracy theorists.