4,021 karma · joined May 11, 2017
In particular I am wondering about that landing mode.
But then half way through, the tone changes to talk about product and business and learning all that commercial stuff.
The story ends talking about the projects only generating minimal revenue, and disappointment stemming from that.
I am far from an expert in this, but what seems to be lacking is clear cut goals from the start on the business side. If the goal is to hack, then the code itself is the reward. If the goal is to start a business, then you need targets (users, revenue, profitability, growth, etc) and plans (product vision, marketing strategy, market research, etc).
I think checklist interviews miss the mark as you say. You may not have a perfect rubric, but I’m not grading students on a history exam; I am evaluating them for a role in a given position. In the limited time we have to speak, I want to use my intuition and experience as an interviewer and engineer to rapidly get to where the candidate is strong, and where they may have issues.
My own interviews have a list of topics I want to cover (non functional requirements, data experience, app design, infrastructure, etc), so I guess there is some structure. But I mostly run the interview based on their own experiences and projects they have worked on. So we will focus on applications and systems they have worked with in the past. And then I see how deep down those rabbit holes of their own system they can go.
Wow. I had no idea CVS owns Aetna!
These e bikes and scooters are going quite fast in urban environments with more or less zero protection for the cyclist/scooterist, and who are closer to pedestrians.
What are the stats on injury rates on these things?
Good senior engineers can usually go fairly deep, they are honest about where they don't have as much knowledge, and are usually candid about what was good and maybe what in retrospect was a hack or a bad decision in retrospect.
I can think of two recent platforms I've looked at that implements very complex micro services and event messaging schemes that could (and should) all be replaced with simple in-process pipelines that can achieve the same outcomes. Every generation of developer seems to need to learn anew that in-process communications are orders of magnitude faster than (and more reliable) than inter-process communications, and that your chatty OOP design will not fair so well as a chatty distributed networking application.
In fact, this line from the article is far more serious: “Apple, for instance, will also need to contend with a reported requirement to allow side-loading of apps outside of its App Store, something it's spent years fighting internationally”.
When parents come in talking about issues, the teachers all put up a wall of educational verbiage and jargon that is impenetrable, but the jargon is designed to make the administration look the other way. Use the magic code words in a meeting and you're OK.
This is more “what percentage 9th graders can read at a basic 9th grade level”, “what percentage of 3rd graders can multiply and do basic 3rd grade math”.
These numbers should be in the 80-90% range. But they are not. And note: the majority who are performing well below grade level are not failing. They are probably getting C’s and getting promoted to the next grade. Meaning every year they fall farther and farther behind.
The reason I think that is Covid. With kids learning remote and going all digital, the facade was lifted from teaching. Parents can and did directly experience what our kids were going through.
Our kids’ lowest standardized State scores were with teachers who were terrible. A science teacher who hated kids in general (really). A general teacher near retirement phoning it in. A math teacher who said “read section 5.6 in your book and do the homework” - and that was class.
Our kids did well where the teachers were creative. Where they interacted with students. Where they gave direct feedback and corrections. Where they gave learning reinforcement extra credit to help them focus in areas they had trouble.
In good public schools and many private schools, these bad teachers are not tolerated. In poor ones, the bad teachers flourish, and the kids suffer.
This is not about the bell curve, it’s about a lot of US schools not actually teaching students successfully.
We tried fighting this but the inertia of “do nothing and pass anyway” was too great.
When we moved them to private school last year (5th and 9th grade), they had a brutal adjustment period of catching up from being so far behind, and for learning studying habits from scratch.
Public schools in the US have problems due to the unions giving too much protection to lousy teachers, and school boards throwing away money like water on things like laptops and athletic fields while not focusing on attracting and paying really good teachers with a track record of success.
It really is a travesty.
She hated it so much that she went back to school to become a physical therapist, and she had been happily doing that for decades.
So it begs the question - can you live on an English degree, and be happy in the real world?
Amazingly Embarcadero still sells and markets it!
Edit: Google says it’s not.