Hardware faking of the keyboard would work fine though
888 karma · joined February 5, 2013
Hardware faking of the keyboard would work fine though
The name might be a slight bit confusing
same with things like yubikey
It seems like it would be better to just fake a keyboard output instead? then you could have something that could work on all platforms in all situations
https://www.reddit.com/r/PeopleFuckingDying/ for when you want to see kids or animals falling over (no gore or death!)
https://www.reddit.com/r/JohnCena/
Are the two that you are probably thinking of
edit: oh I see now, that difference for scaleway should probably be placed as a footnote of the table
I guess my main thing is I don't know if I should trust my understanding of the tree display or not
Perhaps, as a sort-of training assistant, have the resulting "code" optionally appear beside the editor?
e.g. https://i.imgur.com/92stVmi.png
(I also noticed that you are looking for TCO for python, In some cases Coconut can do TCO, and can compile to python, but its somewhat of an unweildly tool to use
http://coconut.readthedocs.io/en/v1.2.2/DOCS.html#function-d... )
edit: I'm guessing its probably a bug that is confusing me the most, as I'm getting both a inline tree and a indented tree at the same time for a node
If someone says "sha2", that doesn't mean bcrypt, after all!
http://stackoverflow.com/a/34599081 has actually gone about doing it, but it has been over a year since that, and as linus says, there has been multiple collision mitigations added as well, so tests should probably be re-done
Does that mean that practically everything to be able to run it on a server without any google API is possible (once those things release)?
http://stackoverflow.com/a/9392525
It might change, but the response could quite likely be a stubborn "I said no before, so I'll say no now"
- - -
This attack has been known since 2013, that is a really long disclosure time (the main thing today is proving that the attack isn't theoretical)
they didn't invent wifi, they invented modern wifi
from the horse's mouth, the lawyer representing the company in the relevant case: "CSIRO did not invent the concept of wireless LAN, it just invented the best way of doing it, the best way it's used now throughout the world,"
In addition, it does seem they had a strong desire to make use of their patent, approaching potential partners, and creating spun-off companies, centered around making use of the technology
while all of their per-hour rates can go above 5bux a month, you won't be charged more than 5 for the month period
A serverless system must scale dynamically per request.
FaunaDB is a globally distributed database that requires
no provisioning — you only pay for what you use.
Well... I guess it does show that the entire article is just an advert? So maybe useful in that way!But nearly no one ever uses it to refer to what is coming up, its almost always what has just happened 1 sentence ago.
> A lot of people have trouble with long runs of samey text.
nothing is more samey than repeating the same sentence!
pull quotes like how this article has,punishes the user for reading the article word for word. There are other methods that have the pull quotes outside of the flow!
And if it is a really important sentence, then throw some slight yellow background on the text or something, like a highlighter!
WHAT POSSESSES PEOPLE
TO USE PULLQUOTES
Its like they don't trust you to read a couple of sentences or somethingI also avoid any groups that for some reason just keep popping up over and over and over (hackernoon for example). I like content aggregates because of content coming from different sources, not the same old ones!
* Work with the community to develop a path forward that allows Firefox to achieve its technology goals while preventing the loss of key functionality that millions of Firefox users depend on.
Haven't they already been doing that?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215059 https://webextensions.uservoice.com/forums/315663-webextensi...
And if the nginx process somehow ends up using more CPU than the python process, then using multiple nginx servers would be fairly easy, compared to multiple application servers
If the user is informed they have a non genuine device that is not safe or secure (e.g. like Windows' nag notification), then they can't expect it to work like a secure device, but more like an ordinary phone.
Then both normal consumers (who will continue to use the phone since they didn't really care too much in the first place about safety) and security conscious consumers (who will re-buy asap) would be more inclined to use the same brand in the future
I don't exactly see how it bumps up the profit though. You have a bunch of obviously interested customers, who want your product, and then the company has come out with "Actually, we expect you to buy the phone twice, because of a mistake that may or may not of been your fault"