4,819 karma · joined May 23, 2010
- you could add new units throughout and train those while freezing existing units (adapter-based fine-tuning)
- you could train all units and use e.g. low-rank adaptation to limit how much they can change
- you could do prefix tuning and train an input to add at every layer
see e.g. - https://lightning.ai/pages/community/article/understanding-l...
The winner might not be something called ChatGPT though.
The AutoGPT stuff is pretty ridiculous...
- ask GPT for the steps to perform a task
- then for each task ask GPT, hey you're good at coding, can you code this? or if not can you break it down into more detailed steps? and add those to the queue
as GPT gets smarter this type of agent workflow seems like it might work quite well for a lot of high-level tasks.
at some point unbundling becomes extreme lack of transparency and customer-hostility if not a downright scam.
there are such things as externalities and transaction costs. they are manufacturing externalities and transaction costs to their benefit.
some companies put out the initial product with high-quality parts and as soon as it gets good reviews and traction they sub out cheaper parts. you could say if they didn't do that they'd have to charge more, they are giving early adopters an incentive or something, people should research which parts they are getting and let the market sort it out. if you value your time and expect reliable information from reviewers it's your problem.
today everything is a SaaS and you are permanently in a hostage situation where your car could get remotely downgraded, they could stop supporting it or discontinue a feature.
a market is a set of legal and social conventions and this is a pretty bad one. if you like markets you should want them to not be hellish, which means reasonable rules and conventions.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/i-cloned-myself-with-ai-she-foo...
(very not impressed by certain financial institutions who seem to be relying on the voice fingerprinting and SMS for 2-factor)
We are just not psychologically adapted or intellectually prepared or availing of a legal framework for the deluge of human-like manipulative, misleading, fraudulent generative fake reality that is about to be unleashed.
Free speech, psychopathic robots, adversaries who want to tear it all down, and gullible humans, are a very bad mix.
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7127982-can-i-fine-tune-...
If a guy ends up living in a gold palace with Michelangelos on the ceiling if those are the only two hypotheses to consider, that might skew his analysis just a bit.
but it's amazing that Google has all the papers and models and the TPU and BERT is pervasive in their products and they can't even stake a better claim to leadership than AWS does here, Amazon stock probably goes up, Google announces anything their stock goes down.
- karpathy - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCc8FmEb1nY
- https://towardsdatascience.com/beautifully-illustrated-nlp-m...
- https://dzone.com/articles/a-deep-dive-into-the-transformer-...
- https://peterbloem.nl/blog/transformers
- http://nlp.seas.harvard.edu/2018/04/03/attention.html
- https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2023-01-27-the-transforme...
- https://blog.quickchat.ai/post/tokens-entropy-question/
- https://dugas.ch/artificial_curiosity/GPT_architecture.html
- https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-...
- https://d4mucfpksywv.cloudfront.net/better-language-models/l...
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.pdf
https://www.fastcompany.com/3021905/hemingways-secret-to-mai...
https://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/article/san-antonio-...
https://nypost.com/2022/02/01/dashcam-shows-florida-man-open...
the bloomberg paper does talk about how they sized the model based on their compute budget and research on time to train ... megatron has 1t parameters
i'm intrigued by some of the knowledge graph performance benchmarks and wonder about training it alongside an explicit knowledge graph, instead of building its own implicit knowledge graph, despite the 'bitter lesson' about just letting simple models and massive computation do their thing.
another fun fact from the paper, it trained for 1.3m GPU hours and didn't get through the whole corpus, did 80% of 1 epoch (p. 16).
another fun fact, according to Twitter rumors GPT-5 is already training on 25,000 A100s w/8 GPUs each, so 4.8m GPU/hours per day.
it's a good paper with a lot more detail than OpenAI is releasing. also confirms OpenAI is quite a bit ahead. They compare with benchmarks they ran with Bloom and open source GPT-NeoX which they were able to run on same data, and reported benchmarks for GPT-3 since you can't run it yourself (well I guess you could sample the API), and BloombergGPT was competitive with GPT-3 which is a couple of years old now.
my takeaway was, this stuff is hard and OpenAI is crushing it.
I wonder if they will just use it for terminal features, or make the API available, and at what cost, and if they will license the model and weights for people who want to run it internally and maybe train incrementally on their own data. (not sure how feasible that is)
literally everyone who knew anything expected it, it's built into every model
what is supposed to happen if the Fed reports book losses or negative equity. hard to go bankrupt if you can literally print money. stupidest FUD and agitprop and unfortunately typical of the WSJ opinion section
by not printing money they are printing money or something..cough...tell me you don't understand monetary policy without telling me you don't understand monetary policy.
the money they lose when rates go up is of no more significance than the profits they make when they create high-powered reserves. everything on the Fed's balance sheet is outside the real economy. what matters to the real economy is the current nominal and real interest rates and the expectations for where they are going.
net income (as opposed to cash flow) is mostly a fiction in general but all the more so when it's the Fed.
these stories amount to "boo! OMG big numbers! Zurg say stop doing economics, they have played us for absolute fools" https://ifunny.co/picture/stop-doing-economics-eyears-of-yet...
seems pretty bad if true. gotta wonder if Block was really that lax that anyone could do that, or if the authors found an exploit and gamed the system, and if the vulnerabilities have been fixed.