Fark. The website you're looking for is Fark. Reddit is far too young.
225 karma · joined October 2, 2022
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/about...
By and large, this only benefits the employer. Why would you support anti-human markets?
As far as 'no more access than', OAuth apps can have full control over your tenant and all data.
You don't have language in your agreement that Microsoft cannot use your data to provide or improve service. You have language that says _support personnel_ cannot access your data without approval.
Microsoft already indexes your mailbox, OneDrive, etc.
Viva Topics has been around for ~2 years which mines content across various services.
Social media is social media. It requires critical thinking skills to navigate what you can trust versus what you cannot. I would have put this point in your GP, though. The GP otherwise reads like it has an agenda.
> relevant authorities do not seem to agree with this.
They're (probably) a more reliable source than social media, so I'd have to refer to the relevant authorities.
Social media (likely) isn't out there gathering soil samples, air quality metrics, and water quality metrics in a uniform or scientific method that would qualify 'social media' to make a judgement call about the impact of the disaster.
It came from the article.
> Today’s hydrogen is “gray,” made by reacting methane with steam at high pressures or using fossil fuels in other ways. Those processes emit some 900 million tons of carbon dioxide every year, almost as much as global aviation. In principle, that carbon could be captured and sequestered underground, yielding “blue” hydrogen. But most hopes rest on “green” hydrogen—using renewable solar or wind power to split water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen with electrolyzers.
_Today_, it is not a clean source of energy for vehicles.
Plus, who wouldn't be proud to be able to claim "I launched something that was shot down by an F-22!"?
If you wanted to _provide_ links to said information and be helpful or provide a factual counter-argument, that would be wonderful. It not only benefits the person you're replying to, but also the rest of the HN community.
Otherwise, this type of response simply raises red flags of evasion and lack of knowledge.
Completely inappropriate and unethical.
What value does this technology add? Bringing Princess Leia back to another Star Wars movie? Anything more than that?
https://www.sqlshack.com/category/sql-server-performance-tun...
I do wish windows rolled up into a bar like MacOS Classic did it.
What does that ROM memory cell _physically look like_? How do we physically manipulate it to contain a 1 or a 0 (absence of something)?
Technology Connections (YouTube) explains this fairly well:
> The bug also allowed the researchers to update the status of any digital CA plate to “STOLEN,” which could alert police and possibly send them after a car falsely labeled as the object of theft.
It's like the old James Bond gag where the license plate rotates. Like this guy did:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6918263/Man-arreste...
Not doing anything (i.e., not developing weapons) will cause the US to slowly lose that footing. And we just need to look at how quickly the PLA(N) has caught up to the USAF/USN (I'm not saying they're an equal, today, but they've come leaps and bounds over 10-20 years ago).
> crazy drones
So does RU, CN, and Iran.
> missiles
See above. When it comes to long range air-to-air and hypersonic, the US is lagging.
> submarines
PLAN is deploying diesel-electric and AIP boats, which can be virtually silent. USN boats are all nuclear powered, which we're good at making them silent, but they'll never be as silent as diesel-electric/AIP.
> nukes
Should never be deployed.
One of the things no one comes close to touching any of the US military branches on is our airlift and logistics.
> How much better do you need to be at war?
So much better than the other guy, you just need to rattle your sword, not use it.
I don't disagree with you about investment into social services, though I feel they're broken not only by funding, but by capitalism itself. I think the other thing we have to remember is that the Military Industrial Complex employs a significant number of workers and even more, if you extend that into all points of State and Federal government that touches the military. Those companies and workers are taxed (maybe). Those taxes cycle back into the system, etc. What kind of system would we have without those millions of workers? No idea. Maybe they'd all be doing something else and my argument would fall flat, which would be great.
Military bad? Yes. Military necessary? Probably, unfortunately, until we're no longer tribalistic. If necessity is a requirement, should we be so much better at it than anyone else on the planet that everyone keeps within their own borders? Yes.
We can expect China to engage Taiwan within the next 6-8 years. And they're practicing for it.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/mock-attack-on-u-s-nav...
(So is Taiwan)
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/taiwan-extends-mandato...