I'd prefer a subscription, and I don't really care to own a random episode, but if I was watching so many shows that the money would be an issue, I would have a cable subscription (I don't).
834 karma · joined May 14, 2009
I'd prefer a subscription, and I don't really care to own a random episode, but if I was watching so many shows that the money would be an issue, I would have a cable subscription (I don't).
BTW the wiki page for Docker references release/0.3.0, but you don't have that branch naming prefix (release/).
As far as I can tell, most of the documentation essentially begins, "First, deploy a web app on our platform". Which is fine I guess, but isn't nearly as simple as the HTTP APIs you see from many other recent SaaS providers. As least for me, I'm pretty unlikely to jump through those hoops. Maybe others will be different.
Edit: All the way down on the bottom of the documentation page, past the research references, there's a link to HTTP API documentation--literally the last link on the page.
1. No "special characters" allowed in passwords when creating an account. 2. ...where's the REST API? I've "added a service" (TTS), but I have to write a webapp to expose it over HTTP? It sure is a different experience than your typical API documentation.
Related: Are there any decent WebDAV servers out there? I don't see any recent development being done on any.
Man, I hate proxies.
Also thanks for that Launchpad description. Keeps happening to my kids and I couldn't figure out why. I'm really disappointed in Apple. I'd really rather have reliable wifi than, say, Continuity.
Would you mind sharing that link? I've got some kids who would be interested.
> Someone will make a service that enables businesses to build applications for $5
Sure, happens all the time. Look at SquareSpace for example. That kind of product you used to need a team of people for. There's examples all over the place. Not sure how you get from there to logo design though. So far computers seem to be at their best when we can clearly describe the rules for them to follow, and design doesn't seem to fall into that category.
That said, a lot of people seem to sweat less on bikes with an electric assist; people worried about sweat might look into those as an alternative.
It's not (necessarily) just marketing fluff. A lot of people view budgeting as "here's what I can't spend money on". It can be easier to stick to a plan when viewed through the lens of getting the maximal enjoyment for the money. There's a lot of people out there who "don't know where it's all going"; the idea is that you consciously decide if you'll be happier spending $100/month on, say, Starbucks or a Beaglebone. Once you know where it's all going, you can decide if you want to spend it on things that might be more enjoyable.
Now, I know that isn't really true: in 2014 it's still somewhat remarkable, sadly, for him to be in that position. But things are looking up! I look forward to the day when a CEO's sexual preference is reported with the same fervor as his or her preference for chocolate ice cream vs. vanilla: not necessarily secret but irrelevant to performance and frankly not very interesting.
> Why only that library...? I've seen it all when a Perl developer is calling out a Java developer regarding TMTOWTDI. Nice library though.
>I would like to execute some shell commands Not sure comparing to a language with an explicit complicit compilation step is fair.
I happen to agree with the people who are annoyed by the lack of a date. For most technical topics I research, I want to know when the article was written. Even for nontechnical topics, I generally want to know if the article represents the author's current thinking or something more distant.
But I'm not most readers, and like tptacek pointed out I'm certainly not entitled to a date on the post. Since I am unlikely to hire the writer, optimizing for my happiness is not exactly expected here. Of course, if I were to be looking to hire the reader, stale content isn't really going to bother me. It could of course affect if I see the content at all (via a search), which I expect may be one of the larger points here.
> People who get banned can either start again with a new account or can write a short email showing understanding of why they got banned and asking to be unbanned.
The issue people are bringing up is, what happens when the banee doesn't know why they got banned (not to mention that they got banned)?
For what it's worth, I usually point out Metafilter as a site that seem to do moderation pretty well. There are of course a number of important differences in the way the sites work, but I bet there are a great many lessons that could be shared in both directions.