1,378 karma · joined March 6, 2013
Don't compare it to other unions or say it could be like X. Just write a few hundred words on what it would actually be like.
But to prevent model collapse you need a way to pump down the entropy. Much like in thermo, it's an expensive and slow process.
Toyota's have such a backlog of orders that they're marking cars up above MSRP
Not much happened between 1861 and 1865?
Farms are renewable so farmers maintain them over centuries. Mines are extractive so they get pumped and dumped.
What landlords do in these situations is try to extract as much money as possible before the enterprise collapses, either literally or figuratively. New housing doesn't come online quickly so both quality and quantity fall.
If it's going down at 1 day per week then it's not so bad. If it's closer to 0.75 days per day, that's much more serious.
Yeah, I've seen those contracts. They just reference a SeCuRiTy doc that's 20+ years old, and has never been re-evaluated. Things are secure because they follow the doc, not because they have actually evaluated the reasonable attack space.
I've fighting customers for years on their ideas of proper TLS usage and it's always the same thing. They've got a security doc that never changes and has never evaluated any of the trade-offs. Almost to the point that the people who wrote them choose things that increase downtime and KTLO work without helping security.
It is not possible to be backwards compatibility with a larger address space
A more cynical view is that the governing boards want a way to pick and choose who they let in. So they create "holistic" application systems to get "360 degree view of the candidate".
How are the investors not completely losing their minds at this kind of spending?
Many ISPs are pushing v4 users into CGNAT so they're easier and cheaper to manage.
This is a big reason why Netflix and YouTube are on v6. To avoid the cost of service over v4.
I can't remember what Oxford did to resolve this, but I think they settled on `C.A.R. Hoare Residence`.
Right now, liquid fuels have about 10x the energy density of batteries. Which absolutely kills it for anything outside of extreme short hop flights. But electric engines are about 3x more efficient than liquid fuel engines. So now we're only 3x-4x of a direct replacement.
That means we are not hugely far off. Boeing's next major plane won't run on batteries, but the one afterwards definitely will.