> For those who start with little to nothing, it's no loss.
Prison rape and violence and loss of agency is "no loss"? I'd argue the fact that in rap circles they'd rather die on the streets than go in tells you something.
3,409 karma · joined February 10, 2020
Prison rape and violence and loss of agency is "no loss"? I'd argue the fact that in rap circles they'd rather die on the streets than go in tells you something.
That bug was actually fixed in the Dvorak release...
> From Middle English -let, -elet, from Old French -elet, a double diminutive from Old French -el + -et.
I know that other independent browsers that I used to use back in the day just gave up because the pace of divergence pushed by the major implementations meant that it wasn't feasible to keep up independently.
I still miss Konqueror.
The term I like is that AI has _industrialised_ those behaviours. While native hunted buffalo, it wasn't destructive until it was industrialised [1] it that it became truly destructive.
That's where you would be wrong. By the time you posted your comment there are already people hawking manganese bracelets on FaceBook as a cure for Lyme disease.
That said, there is hope, because if there is a wireless version and it takes off, it can't be hard to make a wired version.
If you had a company that was making buggy whips at the invention of the automobile, you expect the company profits to go down at no fault of the CEO. A better CEO just changes the slope not the direction.
So what you want to do is not reward based on performance of the company, but on the CEO and to do that you need to figure out the "wins above replacement" [1]. How much better did the CEO do than any schmuck chosen at random.
Already with performance based compensation you have the problem with rewarding executives with the general market as opposed to their own performance. I mean, potentially Jensen Huang is terrible at his job and Nvidia is only making half of the money it should but the AI boom is covering for it.
100% performance means no one would man the ship of a failing company trying to correct the course.
2) the brain-drain is unethical because it takes subsidised education of individuals without returning anything in return. Emmigrants should get a bill of the cost of their upbringing. It's really free-loading, especially for a country with such a poor public education system as the US.
I do not think there is an ethical way to challenge the American economy. It'd be like trying to beat the costs of Dubai's construction industry without enslaving Asians.
Like the US did with Swiss banks?
“…the standard of justice depends on the equality of power to compel and that in fact the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept.” — Thucydides, 5.89 (trans. Rex Warner, Penguin Classics edition)
(half-remembered quote found using AI)
original source https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/History_of_the_Peloponnesian_...
Book 5, end of paragraph 89
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claw_(video_game)
I mean it's 2D platformer, you should be able to reverse engineer the engine and reuse the assets. I mean the have bit perfect decompiles of N64 games to C now. It's doable.
In the past if you didn't find something you needed, you'd design your own. Now you just tweak RISC-V.
I mean "12 variants of RISC-V" is actually less fragmentation than "RISC-V and 11 others".
As long as there is a stable core to target, that is all that matters for main stream adoption, and profiles and distros are already there with RVA23.
At first, you seem like a sensible person, but then you seem to be completely ignorant as to what "moral" means.
...have you met salespeople? Buying lap dances is a legitimate business expense for them. You'd be surprised how much personal rapport matters and facts don't.
In all fairness, I only know about 8 and 9 figure deals, maybe at 10 and 11 salespeople grow ethics...