OCASM

It's always easy to willfully misconstrue what opposition says to justify their silencing. It's exactly what we're seeing at a large scale.

So dissenting is now considered doing political flamewar? Ok.

In those cases it's the business owner who decides. What happens when the decision comes after a mob puts pressure on the owner to drop that costumer or else?

Sure enough, they outright banned it.

If the Left didn't want the Right to be mean to them maybe they shouldn't have called them nazis and deplorables.

What unpersoning looks like in the 21st century.

Probably won't be long before Google starts applying similar pressure.

So none were actually used?

Obstacles to get in, as opposed to BLM's/Antifa's indiscriminate violence and destruction against anything and anybody nearby.

Were they destroying property and throwing molotov cocktails at them like Antifa/BLM did over the summer?

Islam is a religion, not a race.

The left is on the side of critical race theory, the most racist ideology on the planet today.

Apple ties Webkit versions to iOS versions. Once they stop supporting your iOS device every browser on it becomes obsolete.

Leftist totalitarianism.

That sounds reasonable but you don't see mainstream feminism even acknowledge men being disadvantaged against women in certain contexts (family courts, homelessness, etc) and if they do they just blame men for it and continue to advocate for women and minorities only.

Sandboxie is a good option. Development stopped but on the flipside it's fully free now.

So women need a wheelchair but not men? Doesn't seem like sex/gender is a good criteria here. Socioeconomic background would be far more applicable.

Also, to modern feminism equality doesn't mean treating everyone the same but rather to give advantages to what they consider "historically oppressed minorities".

Because people who support these measures are all about the intentions and never care about the results. 60 years of welfare and things are worse off now than before.

We know the solution to poverty, here and everywhere else in the world, is to teach, help and allow people to generate wealth. Instead, programs like welfare only make people completely dependent (for generations) on stealing money from others to the benefit of politicians.

Is the macOS ecosystem filled with malware?

It is in fact those three things. Different stores compete with each other providing different value, both users and devs having the freedom to choose to support one or the other (or all) based on their personal criteria.

Government messing with the housing market is what caused the 2008 recession. I think that's a very good reason not to want that.

There are alternative, cheaper, forms of education. There's nothing wrong with somebody having to pay more for a better quality product or service. Using government to game the system just makes things worse for everyone (government debt, inflated prices, worthless degrees and indenture servants).

Mothers and extended families used to cover that role.

Division of labor works. Moving away from it is the real cause of the drama. Stay at home parents are becoming a dying breed (staying at home because of covid notwithstanding).

No shortage of healthy, yet poor people. Then again we go back to the problem of defining "healthy". Not even the ultra-wealthy are completely illness-free.

Or fines for people who litter. An improvement that actually punishes the people who caused the problem and not those who did nothing wrong.

Those people stopped working because California's government prevented them from doing so. They're entitled to be compensated.

And there's plenty who are fine with this setup. Why should they get screwed over? Calling the removal of worker choice a right is truly perverse.

I'm pretty sure the people you want to help would consider having a job a better treatment than being unemployed.

If California's jobs suck, move. Yes, it's hard but it beats the alternative of destroying more jobs through misguided regulations.