You have an army of behavioral psychologists at Alphabet and Meta working against you; it's only fair to fight back.
876 karma · joined September 6, 2017
You have an army of behavioral psychologists at Alphabet and Meta working against you; it's only fair to fight back.
Only to see that this is neither generally available, nor can you use it without enabling telemetry. I don't know who makes these decisions inside Mozilla, but I just don't get it.
Published a rip-off? "Sorry, Claude must have done this".
Published a shitty/wrong/insensitive/<insert other adjectives here> post somewhere? "Sorry, the AI wrote it"
Regardless of how we view LLMs as a whole, if you produce content with AI and publish it, you personally own every line of what you published. "Claude did it" cannot ever be a valid excuse.
They have three elevators, but pressing one button only calls that specific elevator. So everyone presses all three buttons, meaning the three elevators basically turn into one.
I don‘t understand how this was ever signed off, but I‘ve seen it multiple times now...
In case the author is reading: The decorative feather images are between 2MB to almost 5MB in size. Compression might be in order to save users time and bandwidth, and make the site look less broken while the images are partially loaded :)
1. no code was manually copied by a developer, and
2. all software in the same space copies off of each other
But the big giveaway here is the exact same layout/copywriting on both products. Telling an LLM "write this product and build a 1:1 clone" is still copying by all sensible definitions. The fact that he argues nothing was copied is ridiculous.
But then again, this is very on brand for Meta/Zuck, so I‘m not surprised.
I hope HN enjoys it, and I'd love to hear your thoughts (good and bad)!
Links: https://samhenri.gold/labs/20250906-lid-angle-sensor/ https://github.com/samhenrigold/LidAngleSensor
The website and app work well, in my experience. It's all pretty sleek and modern, too. It's the one area they do a good job in, to be honest.
That said, the large primary display this uses is $2000. That's very hard to justify for any "normal" household, and that's without any mounts, backend, services etc.
Some others: https://samwho.dev https://www.nicchan.me
I wish we'd be more open about our flaws and knowledge gaps in general. I think we'd all benefit.
Having the server return plain JSON means the APIs can be reused across products effortlessly and also means that all style changes can be done in the same codebase.
I get reminded of how important this is every time I get to work on an old project that has APIs return HTML that is then being inserted into the DOM by something like jQuery. Figuring it out and updating it is typically a huge mess.
Maybe I am conditioned to like cards by their excessive use in existing designs, but it might also just be that cards look better, and therefore make the product appear more polished and the site more inviting to use and read. It might not be the most minimal possible design, but a site being pretty is great if functionality doesn't suffer.
Once it gets there, I too will finally leave Arc behind. Until then, while it is on life support, Arc actually works. I really wish The Browser Company would just own up to their fuck up and revive it.