2,099 karma · joined February 15, 2012
(I think that's the point of the article, not having read it)
Frankly, if you want to have an argument over the semantics of language and the interpretation of words, you need to be on top of your writing.
They don't let you in
None, but I would hazard a guess that's because if you want to buy a BMW, a Mercedes or an Audi, you don't need to. You can simply go and buy one!
That said, the key flaw that's raised at the start of the article (how do you know that amazon.de is Amazon) is not really solved with this solution. You still need a trusted third party to bootstrap that first visit.
It's your representative's job to represent you. Marc has no obligation to answer your question.
I must be confused. How are they a patent troll if they actually do the the R&D part of the patent? A patent troll would buy the filed patent and just spend money enforcing it to collect cash...
I am a bit biased because I'm Australian and fully support the CSIRO. They're a non-profit entity[0] - their mandate isn't to make money. The money they do collect from royalties is rolled back into their research.
[0] In that they don't produce a profit for stakeholders. They're a government agency though, not a registered charity.
1. Flatout lies with no factual basis (Hillary Clinton/Donald Trump is a lizard person from Mars)
2. Mis-truths of accepted facts, or mis-representation of statistics (climate change)
3. Opinions that you don't agree with (ACA is good/bad, or The Media is good/bad)
I mean, that's literally how capitalism works. You earn money selling a product or services to people, and use that money to purchase products or services from people.
I agree with this sentiment. Looking into the (very long term) future, it's interesting to look at a fictional post-scarcity society (Star Trek) (with a grain of salt - it's really the writer's imaginations and what you see in the movies/shows) and see what the impact would be. My key takeaways are:
* everyone still works, or studies, and the culture is that you still contribute to society rather than sit around and do nothing. This requires a significant culture change from our current society.
* They often visit colonies and planets that are decidedly not post-scarcity - they are often poor or middle-class colonies, with an agricultural bent. In theory this shouldn't be the case in a post-scarcity society, but it becomes apparent that there's still a cost (resources and time) associated with production and transport unless you want to be ruled by AI overlords.
* pay for private health insurance, or
* pay an additional 2% surcharge/tax on your income
This is to encourage people who can afford it to purchase private health insurance, to lessen the load on the publicly funded system where possible.
... if I didn't stream all my music now.
It's a great idea in theory, but my /home is full of dotfile configs that belong to specific applications - which is great, I can take my configs with me! Except that not all distros have these in the same place. For a given app, some distros will have the config in ~, in ~/.config/, in /etc/, and so on.
While it might not be useful to the organism, could the synthetic base pairs lead to a way to store data? Imagine a bacteria that can be used as a living, self-healing datastore.
These projects often cost $10m+, once you factor in the technical implementation and integration, business process changes, training for business staff, training for IT staff, transition costs, etc.
So if you want to argue that the business should get the solution that fits their requirements the second best, because the 'best' one has an Oracle backend, you had better come up with a shit-hot reason that can't be solved with 'hire a couple of Oracle engineers'.
That's very true, if they're the sort of person you trust to put their personal feelings and opinions aside when they make decisions. If you don't feel they're that sort of person, you better hope their values align to your own.