787 karma · joined July 12, 2011
I personally don't think it's the right way to do things. Big fraud, small lies (fraud), it's all pretty bad.
Stops reading and closes the window. Seriously, what the hell. LA is a great place to eat, but for the love of G... Paris? Tokyo? NYC also kicks LA's ass to the ground regarding food. I know my food, LA's great, but come on.
Just a personal opinion here, but those shared state objects and SwiftUI + glorified singletons really hurts every time I see it. It's so prevalent in online tutorials like Ray Wenderlich and the such.
Honestly, it's hard to avoid and can be done but requires a significant effort. I was hoping for Apple to come up with a more elegant solution during WWDC 21 but so far I haven't seen anything to improve this situation.
I hate to say it but SwiftUI is tricky to write for very complex user interface...the one in that file is a nightmare imo.
I would say that it's a mix, and now things have been formalized a lot in the realm of Jazz (that's a whole subject on its own).
I would say that classical training can definitely help a lot from an interpretation standpoint, there are many technical and harmonic concepts that definitely hold. Some classical repertoire probably helps more and has more parallels to Jazz too.
Something that I have to emphasize though, is that you can be quite proficient at playing classical piano and also have a not very sophisticated harmonic understanding ("interpreter v/s composer"), that understanding is required if you're doing Jazz.
Some examples of non-classically trained Jazz pianists that are incredibly relevant: Thelonius Monk, Art Tatum.
On the other hand, many important Jazz Pianists had extremely relevant classical training. Jarrett being one of the greats and I would mention Brad Mehldau as someone who's extremely influenced by classical as well, and who's still alive and expanding the language of Jazz.
Regarding the "training methods", I would say that the classical training methods are problematic if they're tried to be applied to learning jazz. The successful student will have to adapt and drop a lot of them to learn improvisation, which in the end is the essence of the jazz language.
In classical you're an interpreter, and that's very challenging.
In Jazz, you're an interpreter of an improvisation, which is like composing in real-time. I also have to point out that the great classical composers did improvise a lot, and that trend was lost with time but is documented if you research Mozart, Beethoven and Chopin for instance.
If Parler was deemed illegal (eg: it was ruled by law that it's facilitating terrorism), then YES.
If they are violating Amazon Terms of Service / Apple's Terms of Service, then YES (TOS is a bit of a grey area, but assuming that things are clear enough, those should be enforced). One can argue about a monopolic market position, at which case it's the role of the Government to solve the issue and regulate (in a theoretically speaking, well functioning capitalistic framework).
Even the big brands these days have sampled the DX E. piano, because if you're a live performer it's quite likely that you'll need it if you're playing anything from the 80s in your repertoire (https://www.nordkeyboards.com/sound-libraries/nord-sample-li...).
The DX 7 E.Piano is not a great "E.Piano Sound", but it has a life of its own... :)
Source: Been playing Piano for 27 years and started on Synths ~22 yrs ago... first synth was an FM Korg X5D :)
Eddie was the man though, sad times.
I mean, looking at their line of work and what they're doing with technologies such as image-recognition, and the contracts they seem to be getting, I agree. Anecdotally, whenever they come up in conversation here in the Bay people seem to not like them very much.